lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <70234187-3e7d-4932-8b07-42973337ecb1@lunn.ch>
Date:   Mon, 22 May 2023 16:42:02 +0200
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     David Epping <david.epping@...singlinkelectronics.com>
Cc:     Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 3/3] net: phy: mscc: enable VSC8501/2 RGMII RX clock

> Its my first patch re-submission, so sorry for the noob question:
> Should I include your "pw-bot: changes-requested" tag with the third
> patch? Probably not.

No.

There is a robot listening to emails, and when it sees pw-bot: It uses
the label to change the state of the patch in patchworks:

https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/

The robot does have some basic authentication, so it should actually
ignore such a line from you, since you are not a Maintainer. But even
so, you don't want to make your own new patches as needing changes.

    Andrew

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ