lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 22 May 2023 11:10:48 -0500
From:   Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To:     曾祥翼 <xyzeng@....xidian.edu.cn>
Cc:     Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
        hust-os-kernel-patches@...glegroups.com,
        Dongliang Mu <dzm91@...t.edu.cn>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: dwc: keystone: Free IRQ in `ks_pcie_remove` and the
 error handling section of `ks_pcie_probe`

On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 02:07:10PM +0800, 曾祥翼 wrote:
> On 17/5/2023 03:49, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 01:16:59PM +0800, Xiangyi Zeng wrote:
> > ...

> > > Fixes: 0790eb175ee0 ("PCI: keystone: Cleanup error_irq configuration")
> > > Signed-off-by: Xiangyi Zeng <xyzeng@....xidian.edu.cn>
> > > Reviewed-by: Dongliang Mu <dzm91@...t.edu.cn>
> >
> > It's best if the Reviewed-by tag is not added until Dongliang sends
> > email with that tag directly to the mailing list.  Internal reviews
> > before posting to the mailing list aren't worth much.
>
> In our internal review process, only the patch with the Reviewed-by
> tag can be submitted to the mailing list. You can check this in our
> google group.
> https://groups.google.com/g/hust-os-kernel-patches/c/bt397rzVL24/m/l52XYbG4AgAJ
> We will consider omitting this tag when sending to the kernel mailing
> list in the future.

It's great that Dongliang has already reviewed it; I'm not suggesting
you omit any of that internal review.  My point is that it's best if
Dongliang's email review appears on linux-pci in addition to whatever
internal email list you use.  The hust-os-kernel-patches Google Group
is not archived and searchable the same way linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
is on https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/.

Bjorn

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ