[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wjuNDG-nu6eAv1vwPuZp=6FtRpK_izmH7aBkc4Cic-uGQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 May 2023 10:33:30 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Steve French <smfrench@...il.com>
Cc: CIFS <linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org>,
samba-technical <samba-technical@...ts.samba.org>,
Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: patches to move ksmbd and cifs under new subdirectory
On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 9:33 AM Steve French <smfrench@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Following up on the email thread suggestion to move fs/ksmbd and
> fs/cifs and fs/smbfs_common all under a common directory fs/smb, here
> is an updated patchset for that (added one small patch).
Looks fine to me.
I wouldn't have noticed the typo that Tom Talpey mentioned (misspelled
"common" in the commit message of the first patch), and that
SMB_CLIENT config variable is odd.
I'm actually surprised that Kconfig didn't complain about the
select SMB_CLIENT
when there is no actual declaration of that Kconfig variable, just a random use.
That thing seems confusing and confused, and isn't related to the
renaming, so please drop the new random SMB_CLIENT config variable. If
you want to introduce a new Kconfig variable later for some reason,
that's fine, but please don't mix those kinds of changes up with pure
renames..
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists