[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ce4a0153-1a6b-92d5-b760-489b09bbec73@broadcom.com>
Date: Mon, 22 May 2023 11:25:54 -0700
From: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>
To: Conor Dooley <mail@...chuod.ie>,
Justin Chen <justin.chen@...adcom.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com
Cc: justinpopo6@...il.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
opendmb@...il.com, andrew@...n.ch, hkallweit1@...il.com,
linux@...linux.org.uk, richardcochran@...il.com,
sumit.semwal@...aro.org, christian.koenig@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/6] dt-bindings: net: brcm,unimac-mdio: Add
asp-v2.0
On 5/22/23 11:17, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 02:19:39PM -0700, Justin Chen wrote:
> > The ASP 2.0 Ethernet controller uses a brcm unimac.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Justin Chen <justin.chen@...adcom.com>
> > ---
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/brcm,unimac-mdio.yaml | 2 ++
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git
> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/brcm,unimac-mdio.yaml
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/brcm,unimac-mdio.yaml
> > index 0be426ee1e44..6684810fcbf0 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/brcm,unimac-mdio.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/brcm,unimac-mdio.yaml
> > @@ -22,6 +22,8 @@ properties:
> > - brcm,genet-mdio-v3
> > - brcm,genet-mdio-v4
> > - brcm,genet-mdio-v5
> > + - brcm,asp-v2.0-mdio
> > + - brcm,asp-v2.1-mdio
> > - brcm,unimac-mdio
>
>
> From V(N-1), there was some discussion between Rob & Florian:
> > > How many SoCs does each of these correspond to? SoC specific
> compatibles
> > > are preferred to version numbers (because few vendors are disciplined
> > > at versioning and also not changing versions with every Soc).
> >
> > So far there is a 1:1 mapping between the number of versions and the
> > number of SoCs, and the older SoC uses v2.0, while the newer one uses
> v2.1.
>
> Rob's not around right now, but I don't really get why if there is a 1:1
> mapping you don't just name these things after the SoCs?
There is a 1:1 mapping now, but in the future there may be more SoCs
with a given implemented version. This is especially true for the MDIO
controller which has been largely unchanged since it was introduced.
>
> Also, my mailer **refused** to let me reply to you because of something
> to do with a garbage S/MIME signature? Dunno wtf is happening there.
Our SMTP server is configured to automatically wrap the message in a
S/MIME envelope, nothing invalid though AFAICT. What's your email client?
--
Florian
Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/pkcs7-signature" (4221 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists