[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b3812c08-96fe-f125-66c6-a7db518a37ba@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 22 May 2023 13:20:33 -0500
From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
To: Vijendar Mukunda <Vijendar.Mukunda@....com>, broonie@...nel.org
Cc: alsa-devel@...a-project.org, Basavaraj.Hiregoudar@....com,
Sunil-kumar.Dommati@....com, Mastan.Katragadda@....com,
Arungopal.kondaveeti@....com, mario.limonciello@....com,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 6/9] ASoC: amd: ps: add pm ops support for SoundWire
dma driver
> @@ -464,16 +488,79 @@ static int acp63_sdw_platform_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> status = devm_snd_soc_register_component(&pdev->dev,
> &acp63_sdw_component,
> NULL, 0);
> - if (status)
> + if (status) {
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Fail to register sdw dma component\n");
> + return status;
> + }
> + pm_runtime_set_autosuspend_delay(&pdev->dev, ACP_SUSPEND_DELAY_MS);
> + pm_runtime_use_autosuspend(&pdev->dev);
> + pm_runtime_enable(&pdev->dev);
> + pm_runtime_allow(&pdev->dev);
Can you remind me why you need the pm_runtime_allow()? I can't recall
where the _forbid() is done.
Also is there not a pm_runtime_set_active() missing?
> + return 0;
> +}
>
> - return status;
> +static int acp63_sdw_platform_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
> + return 0;
> }
>
> +static int __maybe_unused acp63_sdw_pcm_resume(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct sdw_dma_dev_data *sdw_data;
> + struct acp_sdw_dma_stream *stream;
> + struct snd_pcm_runtime *runtime;
> + u32 period_bytes, buf_size, water_mark_size_reg;
> + int ret;
> + int index;
> +
> + sdw_data = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> + for (index = 0; index < ACP63_SDW0_DMA_MAX_STREAMS; index++) {
> + if (sdw_data->sdw0_dma_stream[index] &&
> + sdw_data->sdw0_dma_stream[index]->runtime) {
> + water_mark_size_reg = sdw0_dma_ring_buf_reg[index].water_mark_size_reg;
> + runtime = sdw_data->sdw0_dma_stream[index]->runtime;
> + stream = runtime->private_data;
> + period_bytes = frames_to_bytes(runtime, runtime->period_size);
> + buf_size = frames_to_bytes(runtime, runtime->buffer_size);
> + acp63_config_dma(stream, sdw_data->acp_base, index);
> + ret = acp63_configure_sdw_ringbuffer(sdw_data->acp_base, index,
> + buf_size, ACP_SDW0);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + writel(period_bytes, sdw_data->acp_base + water_mark_size_reg);
> + }
> + }
> + for (index = 0; index < ACP63_SDW1_DMA_MAX_STREAMS; index++) {
> + if (sdw_data->sdw1_dma_stream[index] &&
> + sdw_data->sdw1_dma_stream[index]->runtime) {
> + water_mark_size_reg = sdw1_dma_ring_buf_reg[index].water_mark_size_reg;
> + runtime = sdw_data->sdw1_dma_stream[index]->runtime;
> + stream = runtime->private_data;
> + period_bytes = frames_to_bytes(runtime, runtime->period_size);
> + buf_size = frames_to_bytes(runtime, runtime->buffer_size);
> + acp63_config_dma(stream, sdw_data->acp_base, index);
> + ret = acp63_configure_sdw_ringbuffer(sdw_data->acp_base, index,
> + buf_size, ACP_SDW1);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + writel(period_bytes, sdw_data->acp_base + water_mark_size_reg);
> + }
> + }
Isn't this set of configurations something that needs to be done already
somewhere else, i.e. could there be a common helper?
> + acp63_enable_disable_sdw_dma_interrupts(sdw_data->acp_base, true);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct dev_pm_ops acp63_pm_ops = {
> + SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(NULL, acp63_sdw_pcm_resume)
> +};
> +
> static struct platform_driver acp63_sdw_dma_driver = {
> .probe = acp63_sdw_platform_probe,
> + .remove = acp63_sdw_platform_remove,
> .driver = {
> .name = "amd_ps_sdw_dma",
> + .pm = &acp63_pm_ops,
> },
> };
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists