[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230522072412.GA3902@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 22 May 2023 12:54:12 +0530
From: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@...abs.ru>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
"Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)"
<regressions@...mhuis.info>, Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
sachinp@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
Abdul Haleem <abdhalee@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Gaurav Batra <gbatra@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Linux kernel regressions list <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: Probing nvme disks fails on Upstream kernels on powerpc Maxconfig
* Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@...abs.ru> [2023-04-13 22:09:22]:
> > > On 23.03.23 10:53, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I am unable to boot upstream kernels from v5.16 to the latest upstream
> > > > kernel on a maxconfig system. (Machine config details given below)
> > > >
> > > > At boot, we see a series of messages like the below.
> > > >
> > > > dracut-initqueue[13917]: Warning: dracut-initqueue: timeout, still waiting for following initqueue hooks:
> > > > dracut-initqueue[13917]: Warning: /lib/dracut/hooks/initqueue/finished/devexists-\x2fdev\x2fdisk\x2fby-uuid\x2f93dc0767-18aa-467f-afa7-5b4e9c13108a.sh: "if ! grep -q After=remote-fs-pre.target /run/systemd/generator/systemd-cryptsetup@...ervice 2>/dev/null; then
> > > > dracut-initqueue[13917]: [ -e "/dev/disk/by-uuid/93dc0767-18aa-467f-afa7-5b4e9c13108a" ]
> > > > dracut-initqueue[13917]: fi"
> > >
> > > Alexey, did you look into this? This is apparently caused by a commit of
> > > yours (see quoted part below) that Michael applied. Looks like it fell
> > > through the cracks from here, but maybe I'm missing something.
> >
> > Unfortunately Alexey is not working at IBM any more, so he won't have
> > access to any hardware to debug/test this.
> >
> > Srikar are you debugging this? If not we'll have to find someone else to
> > look at it.
>
> Has this been fixed and I missed cc:? Anyway, without the full log, I still
> see it is a huge guest so chances are the guest could not map all RAM so
> instead it uses the biggest possible DDW with 2M pages. If that's the case,
> this might help it:
>
Hi Alexey, Michael
Sorry for the late reply, but I didnt have access to this large system.
This weekend, I did get access and tested with the patch. However it didn't
help much, system is still stuck at dracut with similar message except the
trace.
However this patch
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230418204401.13168-1-gbatra@linux.vnet.ibm.com/
from Gaurav Batra does solve this issue.
--
Thanks and Regards
Srikar Dronamraju
Powered by blists - more mailing lists