[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZGtO1U7Wx7MVi0DL@fedora>
Date: Mon, 22 May 2023 07:15:33 -0400
From: William Breathitt Gray <william.gray@...aro.org>
To: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 05/41] counter: add HAS_IOPORT dependencies
On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 12:42:15PM +0200, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
> On Fri, 2023-05-19 at 10:21 -0400, William Breathitt Gray wrote:
> > On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 03:39:57PM +0200, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2023-05-19 at 15:38 +0200, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2023-05-19 at 15:17 +0200, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, 2023-05-18 at 21:26 -0400, William Breathitt Gray wrote:
> > > > > > On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 01:00:01PM +0200, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
> > > > > > > In a future patch HAS_IOPORT=n will result in inb()/outb() and friends
> > > > > > > not being declared. We thus need to add HAS_IOPORT as dependency for
> > > > > > > those drivers using them.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Co-developed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
> > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
> > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Niklas,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The change itself is fine, but please update the description to reflect
> > > > > > that this is adding a depends on HAS_IOPORT_MAP rather than HAS_IOPORT,
> > > > > > along with the reason why it's needed (i.e. devm_ioport_map() is used).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > William Breathitt Gray
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Right, this clearly needs adjustment. I went with the following commit
> > > > > message for v5:
> > > > >
> > > > > "counter: add HAS_IOPORT_MAP dependency
> > > > >
> > > > > The 104_QUAD_8 counter driver uses devm_ioport_map() without depending
> > > > > on HAS_IOPORT_MAP. This causes compilation to fail on platforms such as
> > > > > s390 which do not support I/O port mapping. Add the missing
> > > > > HAS_IOPORT_MAP dependency to fix this."
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Just noticed this isn't entirely correct. As devm_ioport_map() has an
> > > > empty stub for HAS_IOPORT_MAP=n this doesn't lead to a compile error it
> > > > just doesn't work. Will reword to "This causes the driver to not be
> > > > useable on platforms ..."
> > >
> > > s/useable/usable/
> >
> > 104_QUAD_8 has an explicit dependency on PC104 and X86, so I don't think
> > it would ever be used outside of x86 platforms. Does it still make sense
> > to have the HAS_IOPORT_MAP dependency in this case?
> >
> > William Breathitt Gray
>
> Well, yes and no, you're right that it doesn't really cause compile
> issues despite the "|| COMPILE_TEST" albeit the code could never work.
> Still, I'd add the dependency. At the very least it serves as
> documentation and maybe in the future someone will want to remove those
> empty stubs for HAS_IOPORT_MAP=n.
>
> Thanks
> Niklas
Sure, that reasoning makes sense to me too, so let's go with the
explicit depends afterall.
By the way, I noticed two other modules that call devm_ioport_map() but
seem to be missing the HAS_IOPORT_MAP depends lines: the
drivers/iio/addac/stx104.c and drivers/iio/dac/cio-dac.c drivers. Do
these need respective patches as well?
As an aside, I haven't been following the previous patchsets closely so
forgive me if this has already been discussed in another thread: why
doesn't X86 automatically select HAS_IOPORT? Are there x86 platforms
that do not support ioport?
William Breathitt Gray
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists