linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -next v2 0/6] blk-wbt: minor fix and cleanup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <957c8c91-3d7b-0227-f172-7208558b101f@huaweicloud.com>
Date:   Mon, 22 May 2023 20:12:50 +0800
From:   Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>
To:     Linux regressions mailing list <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>, hch@....de, tj@...nel.org,
        josef@...icpanda.com
Cc:     lukas.bulwahn@...il.com, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        yi.zhang@...wei.com, yangerkun@...wei.com,
        "yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v2 0/6] blk-wbt: minor fix and cleanup

Hi,

在 2023/05/22 20:00, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) 写道:
> On 12.05.23 16:58, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 5/12/23 3:35 AM, Yu Kuai wrote:
>>> From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>
>>>
>>> Changes in v2:
>>>   - make the code more readable for patch 1
>>>   - add a new attr_group that is only visible for rq based device
>>>   - explain in detail for patch 4
>>>   - add review tag for patch 2,3,5
>>>
>>> Yu Kuai (6):
>>>    blk-wbt: fix that wbt can't be disabled by default
>>>    blk-wbt: don't create wbt sysfs entry if CONFIG_BLK_WBT is disabled
>>>    blk-wbt: remove dead code to handle wbt enable/disable with io
>>>      inflight
>>>    blk-wbt: cleanup rwb_enabled() and wbt_disabled()
>>>    blk-iocost: move wbt_enable/disable_default() out of spinlock
>>>    blk-sysfs: add a new attr_group for blk_mq
>>>
>>>   block/blk-iocost.c |   7 +-
>>>   block/blk-sysfs.c  | 181 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>>>   block/blk-wbt.c    |  33 +++------
>>>   block/blk-wbt.h    |  19 -----
>>>   4 files changed, 117 insertions(+), 123 deletions(-)
>>
>> We need a 6.4 version of the fix to get rid of the regression. If you
>> want to do cleanups on top of that, then that's fine and that can go into
>> 6.5. But don't mix them up.
> 
> Hmm, it seems nothing has happened here since ten days to fix this
> regression that likely is still present in 6.3. Yu Kuai, did it fall
> through the cracks, or is what Jens asked for more complicated than it
> sounds?

Sorry for the delay, I was waiting for the last patch to be reviewed.
But the regression is only related to the first patch, I'll send it
seperately.

Thanks,
Kuai
> 
> Or was progress made and I just missed it?
> 
> Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat)
> --
> Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking:
> https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr
> If I did something stupid, please tell me, as explained on that page.
> 
> #regzbot poke
> 
> .
>