linux-kernel - [PATCH 03/26] locking/atomic: hexagon: remove redundant arch_atomic

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 22 May 2023 13:24:06 +0100
From:   Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     akiyks@...il.com, boqun.feng@...il.com, corbet@....net,
        keescook@...omium.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
        linux@...linux.org.uk, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        mark.rutland@....com, paulmck@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
        sstabellini@...nel.org, will@...nel.org
Subject: [PATCH 03/26] locking/atomic: hexagon: remove redundant arch_atomic_cmpxchg

Hexagon's implementation of arch_atomic_cmpxchg() is identical to its
implementation of arch_cmpxchg(). Have it define arch_atomic_cmpxchg()
in terms of arch_cmpxchg(), matching what it does for arch_atomic_xchg()
and arch_xchg().

At the same time, remove the kerneldoc comments for hexagon's
arch_atomic_xchg() and arch_atomic_cmpxchg(). The arch_atomic_*()
namespace is shared by all architectures and the API should be
documented centrally, and the comments aren't all that helpful as-is.

There should be no functional change as a result of this patch.

Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
---
 arch/hexagon/include/asm/atomic.h | 46 +++----------------------------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/hexagon/include/asm/atomic.h b/arch/hexagon/include/asm/atomic.h
index 6e94f8d04146f..738857e10d6ec 100644
--- a/arch/hexagon/include/asm/atomic.h
+++ b/arch/hexagon/include/asm/atomic.h
@@ -36,49 +36,11 @@ static inline void arch_atomic_set(atomic_t *v, int new)
  */
 #define arch_atomic_read(v)		READ_ONCE((v)->counter)
 
-/**
- * arch_atomic_xchg - atomic
- * @v: pointer to memory to change
- * @new: new value (technically passed in a register -- see xchg)
- */
-#define arch_atomic_xchg(v, new)	(arch_xchg(&((v)->counter), (new)))
-
-
-/**
- * arch_atomic_cmpxchg - atomic compare-and-exchange values
- * @v: pointer to value to change
- * @old:  desired old value to match
- * @new:  new value to put in
- *
- * Parameters are then pointer, value-in-register, value-in-register,
- * and the output is the old value.
- *
- * Apparently this is complicated for archs that don't support
- * the memw_locked like we do (or it's broken or whatever).
- *
- * Kind of the lynchpin of the rest of the generically defined routines.
- * Remember V2 had that bug with dotnew predicate set by memw_locked.
- *
- * "old" is "expected" old val, __oldval is actual old value
- */
-static inline int arch_atomic_cmpxchg(atomic_t *v, int old, int new)
-{
-	int __oldval;
+#define arch_atomic_xchg(v, new)					\
+	(arch_xchg(&((v)->counter), (new)))
 
-	asm volatile(
-		"1:	%0 = memw_locked(%1);\n"
-		"	{ P0 = cmp.eq(%0,%2);\n"
-		"	  if (!P0.new) jump:nt 2f; }\n"
-		"	memw_locked(%1,P0) = %3;\n"
-		"	if (!P0) jump 1b;\n"
-		"2:\n"
-		: "=&r" (__oldval)
-		: "r" (&v->counter), "r" (old), "r" (new)
-		: "memory", "p0"
-	);
-
-	return __oldval;
-}
+#define arch_atomic_cmpxchg(v, old, new)				\
+	(arch_cmpxchg(&((v)->counter), (old), (new)))
 
 #define ATOMIC_OP(op)							\
 static inline void arch_atomic_##op(int i, atomic_t *v)			\
-- 
2.30.2