[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0346d5dd-bcb8-1bd9-6943-2c9d83587364@arinc9.com>
Date: Mon, 22 May 2023 16:37:28 +0300
From: Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@...nc9.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
Landen Chao <Landen.Chao@...iatek.com>,
DENG Qingfang <dqfext@...il.com>,
Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Richard van Schagen <richard@...terhints.com>,
Richard van Schagen <vschagen@...com>,
Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@...lic-files.de>,
Bartel Eerdekens <bartel.eerdekens@...stell8.be>,
erkin.bozoglu@...ont.com, mithat.guner@...ont.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 00/30] net: dsa: mt7530: improve, trap BPDU &
LLDP, and prefer CPU port
On 22.05.2023 15:25, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 03:15:02PM +0300, arinc9.unal@...il.com wrote:
>> Hello!
>>
>> This patch series simplifies the code, improves the logic of the switch
>> hardware support, traps LLDP frames and BPDUs for MT7530, MT7531, and
>> MT7988 SoC switches, and introduces the preferring local CPU port
>> operation.
>
> Hi Arınç
>
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/maintainer-netdev.html
>
> says:
>
> Avoid sending series longer than 15 patches. Larger series takes
> longer to review as reviewers will defer looking at it until they
> find a large chunk of time. A small series can be reviewed in a
> short time, so Maintainers just do it. As a result, a sequence of
> smaller series gets merged quicker and with better review coverage.
>
> Given you description above, it sounds like this could easily be split
> into smaller patch series.
Later patches require the prior ones to apply properly. I can submit the
first 15 patches, then the remaining once the first submission is applied.
Would that suit you?
Arınç
Powered by blists - more mailing lists