linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 1/4] iommu: Generalize default PCIe requester ID PASID

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230523144733.GA4137946@myrica>
Date:   Tue, 23 May 2023 15:47:33 +0100
From:   Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.org>
To:     Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
        Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
        vkoul@...nel.org, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
        Raj Ashok <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
        "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>, Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@...el.com>,
        "Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
        Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
        Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        "Zanussi, Tom" <tom.zanussi@...el.com>,
        narayan.ranganathan@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/4] iommu: Generalize default PCIe requester ID PASID

Hi Jacob,

On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 01:32:20PM -0700, Jacob Pan wrote:
> PCIe Process address space ID (PASID) is used to tag DMA traffic, it
> provides finer grained isolation than requester ID (RID).
> 
> For each RID, 0 is as a special PASID for the legacy DMA (without
> PASID), thus RID_PASID. This is universal across all architectures,
> therefore warranted to be declared in the common header.
> Noting that VT-d could support none-zero RID_PASID, but currently not
> used.
> 
> By having a common RID_PASID, we can avoid conflicts between different
> use cases in the generic code. e.g. SVA and DMA API with PASIDs.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> v6:
>    - let SMMU code use the common RID_PASID macro
> ---
>  .../iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-sva.c   |  2 +-
>  drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c   | 10 ++++----
>  drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c                   | 24 +++++++++----------
>  drivers/iommu/intel/pasid.c                   |  2 +-
>  drivers/iommu/intel/pasid.h                   |  1 -
>  include/linux/iommu.h                         |  1 +
>  6 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-sva.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-sva.c
> index a5a63b1c947e..160b31e6239d 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-sva.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-sva.c
> @@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ arm_smmu_share_asid(struct mm_struct *mm, u16 asid)
>  	 * be some overlap between use of both ASIDs, until we invalidate the
>  	 * TLB.
>  	 */
> -	arm_smmu_write_ctx_desc(smmu_domain, 0, cd);
> +	arm_smmu_write_ctx_desc(smmu_domain, IOMMU_DEF_RID_PASID, cd);

I agree with reserving 0 globally for non-PASID DMA, but could we call
this something more generic, like IOMMU_NO_PASID?  The term "RID_PASID" is
specific to VT-d and "RID" to PCI, so it looks confusing here (this driver
also supports non-PCI). "NO_PASID" would be clearer to someone just trying
to follow this driver code.

Thanks,
Jean