linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: ISST: Remove 8 socket limit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZGzZddmPO2T24TjF@swahl-home.5wahls.com>
Date:   Tue, 23 May 2023 10:19:17 -0500
From:   Steve Wahl <steve.wahl@....com>
To:     Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Steve Wahl <steve.wahl@....com>,
        Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        Mark Gross <markgross@...nel.org>,
        platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: ISST: Remove 8 socket limit

On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 12:27:08PM +0300, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> On Fri, 19 May 2023, Steve Wahl wrote:
> 
> > Stop restricting the PCI search to a range of PCI domains fed to
> > pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot().  Instead, use for_each_pci_dev() and
> > look at all PCI domains in one pass.
> > 
> > On systems with more than 8 sockets, this avoids error messages like
> > "Information: Invalid level, Can't get TDP control information at
> > specified levels on cpu 480" from the intel speed select utility.
> > 
> > Fixes: aa2ddd242572 ("platform/x86: ISST: Use numa node id for cpu pci dev mapping")
> > Signed-off-by: Steve Wahl <steve.wahl@....com>
> > ---
> >  .../x86/intel/speed_select_if/isst_if_common.c       | 12 +++++-------
> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/speed_select_if/isst_if_common.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/speed_select_if/isst_if_common.c
> > index e0572a29212e..02fe360a59c7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/speed_select_if/isst_if_common.c
> > +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/speed_select_if/isst_if_common.c
> > @@ -304,14 +304,13 @@ struct isst_if_pkg_info {
> >  static struct isst_if_cpu_info *isst_cpu_info;
> >  static struct isst_if_pkg_info *isst_pkg_info;
> >  
> > -#define ISST_MAX_PCI_DOMAINS	8
> > -
> >  static struct pci_dev *_isst_if_get_pci_dev(int cpu, int bus_no, int dev, int fn)
> >  {
> >  	struct pci_dev *matched_pci_dev = NULL;
> >  	struct pci_dev *pci_dev = NULL;
> > +	struct pci_dev *_pci_dev = NULL;
> >  	int no_matches = 0, pkg_id;
> > -	int i, bus_number;
> > +	int bus_number;
> >  
> >  	if (bus_no < 0 || bus_no >= ISST_MAX_BUS_NUMBER || cpu < 0 ||
> >  	    cpu >= nr_cpu_ids || cpu >= num_possible_cpus())
> > @@ -323,12 +322,11 @@ static struct pci_dev *_isst_if_get_pci_dev(int cpu, int bus_no, int dev, int fn
> >  	if (bus_number < 0)
> >  		return NULL;
> >  
> > -	for (i = 0; i < ISST_MAX_PCI_DOMAINS; ++i) {
> > -		struct pci_dev *_pci_dev;
> > +	for_each_pci_dev(_pci_dev) {
> >  		int node;
> >  
> > -		_pci_dev = pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot(i, bus_number, PCI_DEVFN(dev, fn));
> > -		if (!_pci_dev)
> > +		if (_pci_dev->bus->number != bus_number ||
> > +		    _pci_dev->devfn != PCI_DEVFN(dev, fn))
> >  			continue;
> >  
> >  		++no_matches;
> 
> Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
> 
> With the note that _pci_dev is not a good variable name (but the rename 
> would make this fix larger than it needs to be).

I did look askance at that name for the briefest moment, but came to
the same conclusion.

Thank you for your time reviewing!

--> Steve

-- 
Steve Wahl, Hewlett Packard Enterprise