linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] rust: specify when `ARef` is thread safe

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0b52529c-5570-bfe8-eb53-f51ae00c2e05@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 23 May 2023 13:31:12 -0300
From:   Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@...il.com>
To:     Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
        Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@...il.com>,
        Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>
Cc:     Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
        Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
        Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        patches@...ts.linux.dev, Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] rust: specify when `ARef` is thread safe

On 5/23/23 11:44, Alice Ryhl wrote:
> An `ARef` behaves just like the `Arc` when it comes to thread safety, so
> we can reuse the thread safety comments from `Arc` here.
> 
> This is necessary because without this change, the Rust compiler will
> assume that things are not thread safe even though they are.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>
> Reviewed-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...sung.com>
> Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
> ---
> [...]
>   
> +// SAFETY: It is safe to send `ARef<T>` to another thread when the underlying `T` is `Sync` because
> +// it effectively means sharing `&T` (which is safe because `T` is `Sync`); additionally, it needs
> +// `T` to be `Send` because any thread that has an `ARef<T>` may ultimately access `T` using a
> +// mutable reference, for example, when the reference count reaches zero and `T` is dropped.
> +unsafe impl<T: AlwaysRefCounted + Sync + Send> Send for ARef<T> {}
> +
> +// SAFETY: It is safe to send `&ARef<T>` to another thread when the underlying `T` is `Sync`
> +// because it effectively means sharing `&T` (which is safe because `T` is `Sync`); additionally,
> +// it needs `T` to be `Send` because any thread that has a `&ARef<T>` may clone it and get an
> +// `ARef<T>` on that thread, so the thread may ultimately access `T` using a mutable reference, for
> +// example, when the reference count reaches zero and `T` is dropped.
> +unsafe impl<T: AlwaysRefCounted + Sync + Send> Sync for ARef<T> {}
> +
>   impl<T: AlwaysRefCounted> ARef<T> {
>       /// Creates a new instance of [`ARef`].
>       ///

Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@...il.com>