linux-kernel - Re: [Freedreno] [PATCH] Revert "drm/msm/dp: Remove INIT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e547edf4-1b48-5d12-1600-45f78e7cab49@quicinc.com>
Date:   Tue, 23 May 2023 12:53:19 -0700
From:   Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@...cinc.com>
To:     Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>,
        Leonard Lausen <leonard@...sen.nl>,
        Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
        "Bjorn Andersson" <andersson@...nel.org>
CC:     <freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Sankeerth Billakanti <quic_sbillaka@...cinc.com>,
        Bjorn Andersson <quic_bjorande@...cinc.com>,
        <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
        "Nikita Travkin" <nikita@...n.ru>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
        "Daniel Vetter" <daniel@...ll.ch>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
        Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>,
        Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [Freedreno] [PATCH] Revert "drm/msm/dp: Remove INIT_SETUP delay"


On 5/23/2023 11:56 AM, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
> Hi Leonard
>
> On 5/22/2023 7:39 PM, Leonard Lausen wrote:
>> Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com> writes:
>>>>>> There is no need to add the 100ms delay back yet.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> thanks for posting this but NAK on this patch till we post the 
>>>>>> fix this
>>>>>> week.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Appreciate a bit of patience till then.
>>>>>
>>>>> This regression is already part of the 6.3 stable release series. 
>>>>> Will
>>>>> the new patch qualify for inclusion in 6.3.y? Or will it be part 
>>>>> of 6.4
>>>>> and this revert should go into 6.3.y?
>>>>
>>>> This is a tough situation, as landing a revert will break x13s, as 
>>>> noted
>>>> by Bjorn. Given that the workaround is known at this moment, I would
>>>> like to wait for the patch from Abhinav to appear, then we can decide
>>>> which of the fixes should go to the stable kernel.
>>
>> I wasn't able to find new patches, though may have missed them. Is there
>> a decision yet how to proceed with this regression? 6.2 now being EOL
>> may make this a good moment to decide on the next steps.
>>
>
> Yes, the new patch to fix this issue is here
>
> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/538601/?series=118148&rev=3
>
> Apologies if you were not CCed on this, if a next version is CCed, 
> will ask kuogee to cc you.
>
> Meanwhile, will be great if you can verify if it works for you and 
> provide Tested-by tags.

Hi Leonard,

I had  cc you with v5 patches.

Would you please verify it.

Thanks,

>
>>>>> [  275.025497] [drm:dpu_encoder_phys_vid_wait_for_commit_done:488]
>>>>> [dpu error]vblank timeout
>>>>> [  275.025514] [drm:dpu_kms_wait_for_commit_done:510] [dpu error]wait
>>>>> for commit done returned -110
>>>>> [  275.064141] [drm:dpu_encoder_frame_done_timeout:2382] [dpu
>>>>> error]enc33 frame done timeout
>>>
>>> This is a different crash but the root-cause of both the issues is the
>>> bridge hpd_enable/disable series.
>>>
>>> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/514414/
>>>
>>> This is breaking the sequence and logic of internal hpd as per my
>>> discussion with kuogee.
>>>
>>> We are analyzing the issue and the fix internally first and once we
>>> figure out all the details will post it.
>>
>> Thank you!