linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] tpm, tpm_tis: reuse code in disable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f22d2c28-5934-a989-3aea-4ff4d20b6326@kunbus.com>
Date:   Tue, 23 May 2023 22:52:48 +0200
From:   Lino Sanfilippo <l.sanfilippo@...bus.com>
To:     Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>,
        Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@....de>, peterhuewe@....de,
        jgg@...pe.ca
Cc:     jsnitsel@...hat.com, hdegoede@...hat.com, oe-lkp@...ts.linux.dev,
        lkp@...el.com, peter.ujfalusi@...ux.intel.com,
        peterz@...radead.org, linux@...ewoehner.de,
        linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        lukas@...ner.de, p.rosenberger@...bus.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] tpm, tpm_tis: reuse code in disable_interrupts()



On 23.05.23 21:07, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:

> 
> NAK as invidual change w/o further discussion.
> 
> Would need to be seen in context. This does not change kernel for
> better.
> 
> If you want to wrap, please do it in 1/2 and then we can evaluate
> whether it makes sense or not.
> 

Ok, will do so.

Regards,
Lino