lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 23 May 2023 08:16:06 +0530
From:   Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
To:     Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        coresight@...ts.linaro.org
Cc:     Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gankulkarni@...amperecomputing.com>,
        Steve Clevenger <scclevenger@...amperecomputing.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
        Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
        Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
        Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>,
        Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 6/6] coresight: platform: acpi: Ignore the absence of
 graph



On 5/19/23 18:10, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> On 19/05/2023 06:21, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>> From: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
>>
>> Some components may not have graph connections for describing
>> the trace path. e.g., ETE, where it could directly use the per
>> CPU TRBE. Ignore the absence of graph connections
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
>> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
> 
> Please could you move this before the Patch 5, where we add
> ACPI support for etm4x with system instructions ? That way
> the support is up with that patch, without an error that
> is fixed by this patch.

Sure, will move it before adding the ACPI support patch.

> 
> Suzuki
> 
> 
>> ---
>>   drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-platform.c | 6 +++++-
>>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-platform.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-platform.c
>> index 475899714104..c4b4fbde8550 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-platform.c
>> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-platform.c
>> @@ -692,8 +692,12 @@ static int acpi_coresight_parse_graph(struct acpi_device *adev,
>>         pdata->nr_inport = pdata->nr_outport = 0;
>>       graph = acpi_get_coresight_graph(adev);
>> +    /*
>> +     * There are no graph connections, which is fine for some components.
>> +     * e.g., ETE
>> +     */
>>       if (!graph)
>> -        return -ENOENT;
>> +        return 0;
>>         nlinks = graph->package.elements[2].integer.value;
>>       if (!nlinks)
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ