| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAHCN7x+pFM7_yAWxVaUCKyLQ1A_5-F4sQ_t2k2iug7DdD9PwmQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 May 2023 22:23:16 -0500
From: Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com>
To: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....nxp.com>
Cc: linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, aford@...conembedded.com,
Abel Vesa <abelvesa@...nel.org>, Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
"moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: imx: composite-8m: Add imx8m_divider_determine_rate
On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 9:33 PM Peng Fan <peng.fan@....nxp.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 5/7/2023 3:53 AM, Adam Ford wrote:
> > Caution: This is an external email. Please take care when clicking links or opening attachments. When in doubt, report the message using the 'Report this email' button
> >
> >
> > Currently, certain clocks are derrived as a divider from their
> > parent clock. For some clocks, even when CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT
> > is set, the parent clock is not properly set which can lead
> > to some relatively inaccurate clock values.
> >
> > Unlike imx/clk-composite-93 and imx/clk-divider-gate, it
> > cannot rely on calling a standard determine_rate function,
> > because the 8m composite clocks have a pre-divider and
> > post-divider. Because of this, a custom determine_rate
> > function is necessary to determine the maximum clock
> > division which is equivalent to pre-divider * the
> > post-divider.
> >
> > With this added, the system can attempt to adjust the parent rate
> > when the proper flags are set which can lead to a more precise clock
> > value.
> >
> > On the imx8mplus, no clock changes are present.
> > On the Mini and Nano, this can help achieve more accurate
> > lcdif clocks. When trying to get a pixel clock of 31.500MHz
> > on an imx8m Nano, the clocks divided the 594MHz down, but
> > left the parent rate untouched which caused a calulation error.
>
> Not all clocks has pre/post div both.
>
> If CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT not set, would there be any issues for
> other clocks?
I did a dump of the clk_summary for Mini, Nano and Plus, and I found
no changes to any clock other than the video_pll, and most of the
clocks do not have CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT set, so from what I could tell
it seemed harmless.
>
> Regards,
> Peng.
>
> >
> > Before:
> > video_pll 594000000
> > video_pll_bypass 594000000
> > video_pll_out 594000000
> > disp_pixel 31263158
> > disp_pixel_clk 31263158
> >
> > Variance = -236842 Hz
> >
> > After this patch:
> > video_pll 31500000
> > video_pll_bypass 31500000
> > video_pll_out 31500000
> > disp_pixel 31500000
> > disp_pixel_clk 31500000
> >
> > Variance = 0 Hz
> >
> > All other clocks rates and parent were the same.
> > Similar results on imx8mm were found.
> >
> > Fixes: 690dccc4a0bf ("Revert "clk: imx: composite-8m: Add support to determine_rate"")
> > Signed-off-by: Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com>
> > ---
> > V2: Fix build warning found by build bot and fix prediv_value
> > and div_value because the values stored are the divisor - 1,
> > so we need to add 1 to the values to be correct.
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-composite-8m.c b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-composite-8m.c
> > index cbf0d7955a00..7a6e3ce97133 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-composite-8m.c
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-composite-8m.c
> > @@ -119,10 +119,41 @@ static int imx8m_clk_composite_divider_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > +static int imx8m_divider_determine_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
> > + struct clk_rate_request *req)
> > +{
> > + struct clk_divider *divider = to_clk_divider(hw);
> > + int prediv_value;
> > + int div_value;
> > +
> > + /* if read only, just return current value */
> > + if (divider->flags & CLK_DIVIDER_READ_ONLY) {
> > + u32 val;
> > +
> > + val = readl(divider->reg);
> > + prediv_value = val >> divider->shift;
> > + prediv_value &= clk_div_mask(divider->width);
> > + prediv_value++;
> > +
> > + div_value = val >> PCG_DIV_SHIFT;
> > + div_value &= clk_div_mask(PCG_DIV_WIDTH);
> > + div_value++;
> > +
> > + return divider_ro_determine_rate(hw, req, divider->table,
> > + PCG_PREDIV_WIDTH + PCG_DIV_WIDTH,
> > + divider->flags, prediv_value * div_value);
> > + }
> > +
> > + return divider_determine_rate(hw, req, divider->table,
> > + PCG_PREDIV_WIDTH + PCG_DIV_WIDTH,
> > + divider->flags);
> > +}
> > +
> > static const struct clk_ops imx8m_clk_composite_divider_ops = {
> > .recalc_rate = imx8m_clk_composite_divider_recalc_rate,
> > .round_rate = imx8m_clk_composite_divider_round_rate,
> > .set_rate = imx8m_clk_composite_divider_set_rate,
> > + .determine_rate = imx8m_divider_determine_rate,
> > };
> >
> > static u8 imx8m_clk_composite_mux_get_parent(struct clk_hw *hw)
> > --
> > 2.39.2
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists