[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZGxfrOLZ4aN9/MvE@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 22 May 2023 23:39:40 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>,
Hillf Danton <hdanton@...a.com>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v21 0/6] block: Use page pinning
On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 09:57:38PM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> Hi Jens, Al, Christoph,
>
> This patchset rolls page-pinning out to the bio struct and the block layer,
> using iov_iter_extract_pages() to get pages and noting with BIO_PAGE_PINNED
> if the data pages attached to a bio are pinned. If the data pages come
> from a non-user-backed iterator, then the pages are left unpinned and
> unref'd, relying on whoever set up the I/O to do the retaining.
I think I already review the patches, so nothing new here. But can
you please also take care of the legacy direct I/O code? I'd really
hate to leave yet another unfinished transition around.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists