[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZGx1jT4nQ9HEVWSE@linux.dev>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2023 08:13:01 +0000
From: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] arm64/sysreg: Convert OSLAR_EL1 to automatic
generation
On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 05:22:44PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> Convert OSLAR_EL1 to automatic generation as per DDI0601 2023-03. No
> functional change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h | 3 ---
> arch/arm64/tools/sysreg | 5 +++++
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
> index 09de958e79ed..3b51e532caa9 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
> @@ -140,9 +140,6 @@
> #define SYS_DBGWCRn_EL1(n) sys_reg(2, 0, 0, n, 7)
> #define SYS_MDRAR_EL1 sys_reg(2, 0, 1, 0, 0)
>
> -#define SYS_OSLAR_EL1 sys_reg(2, 0, 1, 0, 4)
> -#define OSLAR_EL1_OSLK BIT(0)
> -
> #define SYS_OSLSR_EL1 sys_reg(2, 0, 1, 1, 4)
> #define OSLSR_EL1_OSLM_MASK (BIT(3) | BIT(0))
> #define OSLSR_EL1_OSLM_NI 0
Should the OSLSR_EL1 definitions be rolled over to the generated scheme
as well?
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/tools/sysreg b/arch/arm64/tools/sysreg
> index a5ae0e19fc9f..84df0b7feb45 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/tools/sysreg
> +++ b/arch/arm64/tools/sysreg
> @@ -83,6 +83,11 @@ Res0 5:1
> Field 0 SS
> EndSysreg
>
> +Sysreg OSLAR_EL1 2 0 1 0 4
> +Res0 63:1
> +Field 0 OSLK
> +EndSysreg
> +
> Sysreg ID_PFR0_EL1 3 0 0 1 0
> Res0 63:32
> UnsignedEnum 31:28 RAS
>
> --
> 2.30.2
>
--
Thanks,
Oliver
Powered by blists - more mailing lists