[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMRc=MegFzyKSW6KAOUHfdMqnZGb3iAqhCbVrn2GFmyEqPTbcw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2023 10:48:30 +0200
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To: Henning Schild <henning.schild@...mens.com>
Cc: "Wu, Xing Tong (DI FA CTR IPC CN PRC4)" <XingTong.Wu@...mens.com>,
Simon Guinot <simon.guinot@...uanux.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] gpio-f7188x: fix chip name and pin count on
Nuvoton chip
On Sat, May 13, 2023 at 11:53 AM Henning Schild
<henning.schild@...mens.com> wrote:
>
> Am Thu, 11 May 2023 14:52:17 +0200
> schrieb Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>:
>
> > On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 11:33 AM Henning Schild
> > <henning.schild@...mens.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Am Fri, 28 Apr 2023 10:26:18 +0200
> > > schrieb "Wu, Xing Tong (DI FA CTR IPC CN PRC4)"
> > > <XingTong.Wu@...mens.com>:
> > >
> > > > Hi all
> > > >
> > > > The chip id of NCT6116D is 0XD281, you can refer to
> > > > NCT6116D_Datasheet_V1_0.pdf, Page 291
> > >
> > > Thanks Xing Tong. I think we have come to agree that for now
> > > NCT6116D 0xD281 will not be supported in the kernel. Maybe until
> > > someone has access to that very chip and a use-case.
> > >
> > > But you managed to somehow get these datasheets, which are still not
> > > publicly available. Maybe you can use your contacts at Nuvoton to
> > > kindly ask them to publish those specs on their website for future
> > > reference. Some specs are there, but not all. That would help
> > > people to add more chips and avoid mistakes like they happened to
> > > me.
> > >
> > > Henning
> > >
> >
> > Henning, do you plan to respin this with the ID corrected?
>
> Bart, no this one fixes the name of the chip i have at hand, and fixes
> the size of its last bank. So it is valid on its own and should IMHO be
> merged as is.
>
> Since i do not have a NCT6116D (0xD281) i could basically just guess
> (not too hard) but not test. And i do not really feel like contributing
> untested code for which there is no known user/tester.
>
> Henning
>
> > Bart
>
Fair enough, applied.
Bart
Powered by blists - more mailing lists