linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] workqueue: Fix warning triggered when nr_running is checked in worker_enter

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+G9fYvdv4wJiE=Eb=daswxMybQ7Ui11-p8i+eRKUrpdfQEnJw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 23 May 2023 16:15:56 +0530
From:   Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
To:     Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@...il.com>,
        Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>
Cc:     tj@...nel.org, jiangshanlai@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] workqueue: Fix warning triggered when nr_running is
 checked in worker_enter_idle()

Hi Zqiang,

On Tue, 23 May 2023 at 08:49, Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Currently, the nr_running can be modified from timer tick, that means
> the timer tick can run in not-irq-protected critical section to modify
> nr_runnig, consider the following scenario:
>
> CPU0
> kworker/0:2 (events)
>    worker_clr_flags(worker, WORKER_PREP | WORKER_REBOUND);
>    ->pool->nr_running++;  (1)
>
>    process_one_work()
>    ->worker->current_func(work);
>      ->schedule()
>        ->wq_worker_sleeping()
>          ->pool->nr_running--;  (0)
>            ....
>        ->wq_worker_running()
>            ....
>            CPU0 by interrupt:
>            wq_worker_tick()
>            ->worker_set_flags(worker, WORKER_CPU_INTENSIVE);
>              ->pool->nr_running--;  (-1)
>              ->worker->flags |= WORKER_CPU_INTENSIVE;
>            ....
>          ->if (!(worker->flags & WORKER_NOT_RUNNING))
>            ->pool->nr_running++;    (will not execute)
>            ....
>     ->worker_clr_flags(worker, WORKER_CPU_INTENSIVE);
>       ->pool->nr_running++;  (0)
>     ....
>     worker_set_flags(worker, WORKER_PREP);
>     ->pool->nr_running--;   (-1)
>     ....
>     worker_enter_idle()
>     ->WARN_ON_ONCE(pool->nr_workers == pool->nr_idle && pool->nr_running);
>
> if the nr_workers is equal to nr_idle, due to the nr_running is not zero,
> will trigger WARN_ON_ONCE().
>
> [    2.460602] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 63 at kernel/workqueue.c:1999 worker_enter_idle+0xb2/0xc0
> [    2.462163] Modules linked in:
> [    2.463401] CPU: 0 PID: 63 Comm: kworker/0:2 Not tainted 6.4.0-rc2-next-20230519 #1
> [    2.463771] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.14.0-2 04/01/2014
> [    2.465127] Workqueue:  0x0 (events)
> [    2.465678] RIP: 0010:worker_enter_idle+0xb2/0xc0
> ...
> [    2.472614] Call Trace:
> [    2.473152]  <TASK>
> [    2.474182]  worker_thread+0x71/0x430
> [    2.474992]  ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x28/0x50
> [    2.475263]  kthread+0x103/0x120
> [    2.475493]  ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10
> [    2.476355]  ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
> [    2.476635]  ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x50
> [    2.477051]  </TASK>
>
> This commit therefore add irq protection in wq_worker_running() to
> block timer tick modify nr_running.
>
> Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
> Closes: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-next-master/build/next-20230519/testrun/17078554/suite/boot/test/clang-nightly-lkftconfig/log
> Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@...il.com>

Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>
Tested-by: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>


This proposed fix patch applied on top of Linux next and tested
for more than 100 times and reported issues has been fixed.

Thank you.

- Naresh

> ---
>  kernel/workqueue.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
> index 9c5c1cfa478f..f8d739fef311 100644
> --- a/kernel/workqueue.c
> +++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
> @@ -1060,10 +1060,9 @@ void wq_worker_running(struct task_struct *task)
>          * and leave with an unexpected pool->nr_running == 1 on the newly unbound
>          * pool. Protect against such race.
>          */
> -       preempt_disable();
> +       local_irq_disable();
>         if (!(worker->flags & WORKER_NOT_RUNNING))
>                 worker->pool->nr_running++;
> -       preempt_enable();
>
>         /*
>          * CPU intensive auto-detection cares about how long a work item hogged
> @@ -1072,6 +1071,7 @@ void wq_worker_running(struct task_struct *task)
>         worker->current_at = worker->task->se.sum_exec_runtime;
>
>         worker->sleeping = 0;
> +       local_irq_enable();
>  }
>
>  /**
> --
> 2.17.1
>