[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230523135709.6902-1-xu.xin16@zte.com.cn>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2023 21:57:09 +0800
From: xu xin <xu.xin.sc@...il.com>
To: david@...hat.com
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com,
jiang.xuexin@....com.cn, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, ran.xiaokai@....com.cn, xu.xin.sc@...il.com,
xu.xin16@....com.cn, yang.yang29@....com.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/6] ksm: support unsharing KSM-placed zero pages
>> ---
>> include/linux/ksm.h | 6 ++++++
>> mm/ksm.c | 5 +++--
>> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/ksm.h b/include/linux/ksm.h
>> index 899a314bc487..7989200cdbb7 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/ksm.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/ksm.h
>> @@ -26,6 +26,9 @@ int ksm_disable(struct mm_struct *mm);
>>
>> int __ksm_enter(struct mm_struct *mm);
>> void __ksm_exit(struct mm_struct *mm);
>> +/* use pte_mkdirty to track a KSM-placed zero page */
>> +#define set_pte_ksm_zero(pte) pte_mkdirty(pte_mkspecial(pte))
>
>If there is only a single user (which I assume), please inline it instead.
Excuse me, I'm wondering why using inline here instead of macro is better.
Thanks! :)
Thanks for reviews.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists