[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM9d7cif9PPBWPEZx6MA6E4FHaAQLbi-0pEGwLrtLxiEASog9Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2023 09:10:47 -0700
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf annotate: Handle x86 instruction suffix generally
Hi Adrian,
On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 11:11 PM Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com> wrote:
>
> On 24/05/23 08:28, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > Most of x86 instructions can have size suffix like b, w, l or q.
>
> (AT&T mnemonics)
Right, will update.
>
> > Instead of adding all these instructions in the table, we can handle
> > them in a general way. For example, it can try to find an instruction
> > as is. If not found, it'd try again without the suffix if it's one of
> > the allowed suffixes.
>
> I guess it might be possible that xyz is in the table but xyz<suffix>
> is a completely different instruction?
Then xyz<suffix> should be in the table too. The match without
suffix is a fallback so it should find the correct instruction first.
Thanks,
Namhyung
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
> > ---
> > tools/perf/util/annotate.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
> > index b708bbc49c9e..7f05f2a2aa83 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
> > @@ -70,6 +70,7 @@ struct arch {
> > struct ins_ops *(*associate_instruction_ops)(struct arch *arch, const char *name);
> > bool sorted_instructions;
> > bool initialized;
> > + const char *insn_suffix;
> > void *priv;
> > unsigned int model;
> > unsigned int family;
> > @@ -179,6 +180,7 @@ static struct arch architectures[] = {
> > .init = x86__annotate_init,
> > .instructions = x86__instructions,
> > .nr_instructions = ARRAY_SIZE(x86__instructions),
> > + .insn_suffix = "bwlq",
> > .objdump = {
> > .comment_char = '#',
> > },
> > @@ -720,6 +722,26 @@ static struct ins_ops *__ins__find(struct arch *arch, const char *name)
> > }
> >
> > ins = bsearch(name, arch->instructions, nmemb, sizeof(struct ins), ins__key_cmp);
> > + if (ins)
> > + return ins->ops;
> > +
> > + if (arch->insn_suffix) {
> > + char tmp[32];
> > + char suffix;
> > + size_t len = strlen(name);
> > +
> > + if (len == 0 || len >= sizeof(tmp))
> > + return NULL;
> > +
> > + suffix = name[len - 1];
> > + if (strchr(arch->insn_suffix, suffix) == NULL)
> > + return NULL;
> > +
> > + strcpy(tmp, name);
> > + tmp[len - 1] = '\0'; /* remove the suffix and check again */
> > +
> > + ins = bsearch(tmp, arch->instructions, nmemb, sizeof(struct ins), ins__key_cmp);
> > + }
> > return ins ? ins->ops : NULL;
> > }
> >
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists