lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 24 May 2023 17:36:04 +0100
From:   Stuart Henderson <stuarth@...nsource.cirrus.com>
To:     Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>, Luke Jones <luke@...nes.dev>
CC:     <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <tiwai@...e.com>,
        <sbinding@...nsource.cirrus.com>, <perex@...ex.cz>,
        <tangmeng@...ontech.com>, <andy.chi@...onical.com>,
        <p.jungkamp@....net>, <kasper93@...il.com>,
        <yangyuchi66@...il.com>, <armas@...ux.tech>, <ealex95@...il.com>,
        <james.schulman@...rus.com>, <david.rhodes@...rus.com>,
        <tanureal@...nsource.cirrus.com>, <rf@...nsource.cirrus.com>,
        <patches@...nsource.cirrus.com>, <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>
Subject: Re: CSC3551 and devices missing related _DSD bits


> The problem is that this can really easily blow up your machine if
> some incorrect bit is applied.  And more easily applicable, more
> chance to break by novice users, simply by believing what a chat bot
> speaks :)
> That's the very reason why this kind of change should be via ACPI
> table officially set up by the vendor.  That said, the question is
> only who and how can be responsible for this kind of change.  It's
> no technical issue, per se.
>
> If BIOS can't be updated, at least, the configuration change has to be
> confirmed by ASUS people.  If ASUS still ignores the inquires and
> requests, we may put the quirk but with a bit fat warning (and maybe
> complaints to ASUS) to be shown in the log as a very last resort.
>
> Let's see what happens.

Thanks Takashi.

Just a note to say we're not ignoring this and are investigating the 
best way to support released laptops with ACPI incompatible with Linux.  
We're hoping this is going to be less of an issue going forward.  Please 
bear with us while we look into this.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ