[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230524165717.14062-11-chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2023 09:57:15 -0700
From: "Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@...el.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
dm-devel@...hat.com
Cc: ebiggers@...nel.org, elliott@....com, gmazyland@...il.com,
luto@...nel.org, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
bp@...en8.de, mingo@...nel.org, x86@...nel.org,
herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, ardb@...nel.org,
dan.j.williams@...el.com, bernie.keany@...el.com,
charishma1.gairuboyina@...el.com,
lalithambika.krishnakumar@...el.com, nhuck@...gle.com,
chang.seok.bae@...el.com, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: [PATCH v7 10/12] crypto: x86/aesni - Use the proper data type in struct aesni_xts_ctx
Every field in struct aesni_xts_ctx is a pointer to a byte array. Each
array has a size of struct crypto_aes_ctx. Then, the field can be
redefined as that struct type instead of the obscure pointer.
Subsequently, the address to struct aesni_xts_ctx should be aligned
right away. This can also simplify the runtime alignment code.
Redefine struct aesni_xts_ctx, and align its address on the front.
This draws a rework by refactoring the common alignment code. Then,
clean up the alignment for the old pointers.
Suggested-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Chang S. Bae <chang.seok.bae@...el.com>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: x86@...nel.org
Cc: linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
---
Changes from v6:
* Add as a new patch. (Eric Biggers)
This fix was considered to be better addressed before the preparatory
AES-NI code rework.
---
arch/x86/crypto/aesni-intel_glue.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/crypto/aesni-intel_glue.c b/arch/x86/crypto/aesni-intel_glue.c
index a5b0cb3efeba..97a1629b84c4 100644
--- a/arch/x86/crypto/aesni-intel_glue.c
+++ b/arch/x86/crypto/aesni-intel_glue.c
@@ -61,8 +61,8 @@ struct generic_gcmaes_ctx {
};
struct aesni_xts_ctx {
- u8 raw_tweak_ctx[sizeof(struct crypto_aes_ctx)] AESNI_ALIGN_ATTR;
- u8 raw_crypt_ctx[sizeof(struct crypto_aes_ctx)] AESNI_ALIGN_ATTR;
+ struct crypto_aes_ctx tweak_ctx AESNI_ALIGN_ATTR;
+ struct crypto_aes_ctx crypt_ctx AESNI_ALIGN_ATTR;
};
#define GCM_BLOCK_LEN 16
@@ -219,14 +219,20 @@ generic_gcmaes_ctx *generic_gcmaes_ctx_get(struct crypto_aead *tfm)
}
#endif
+static inline unsigned long aes_align_addr(unsigned long addr)
+{
+ return (crypto_tfm_ctx_alignment() >= AESNI_ALIGN) ?
+ ALIGN(addr, 1) : ALIGN(addr, AESNI_ALIGN);
+}
+
static inline struct crypto_aes_ctx *aes_ctx(void *raw_ctx)
{
- unsigned long addr = (unsigned long)raw_ctx;
- unsigned long align = AESNI_ALIGN;
+ return (struct crypto_aes_ctx *)aes_align_addr((unsigned long)raw_ctx);
+}
- if (align <= crypto_tfm_ctx_alignment())
- align = 1;
- return (struct crypto_aes_ctx *)ALIGN(addr, align);
+static inline struct aesni_xts_ctx *aes_xts_ctx(struct crypto_skcipher *tfm)
+{
+ return (struct aesni_xts_ctx *)aes_align_addr((unsigned long)crypto_skcipher_ctx(tfm));
}
static int aes_set_key_common(struct crypto_tfm *tfm, void *raw_ctx,
@@ -883,7 +889,7 @@ static int helper_rfc4106_decrypt(struct aead_request *req)
static int xts_aesni_setkey(struct crypto_skcipher *tfm, const u8 *key,
unsigned int keylen)
{
- struct aesni_xts_ctx *ctx = crypto_skcipher_ctx(tfm);
+ struct aesni_xts_ctx *ctx = aes_xts_ctx(tfm);
int err;
err = xts_verify_key(tfm, key, keylen);
@@ -893,20 +899,20 @@ static int xts_aesni_setkey(struct crypto_skcipher *tfm, const u8 *key,
keylen /= 2;
/* first half of xts-key is for crypt */
- err = aes_set_key_common(crypto_skcipher_tfm(tfm), ctx->raw_crypt_ctx,
+ err = aes_set_key_common(crypto_skcipher_tfm(tfm), &ctx->crypt_ctx,
key, keylen);
if (err)
return err;
/* second half of xts-key is for tweak */
- return aes_set_key_common(crypto_skcipher_tfm(tfm), ctx->raw_tweak_ctx,
+ return aes_set_key_common(crypto_skcipher_tfm(tfm), &ctx->tweak_ctx,
key + keylen, keylen);
}
static int xts_crypt(struct skcipher_request *req, bool encrypt)
{
struct crypto_skcipher *tfm = crypto_skcipher_reqtfm(req);
- struct aesni_xts_ctx *ctx = crypto_skcipher_ctx(tfm);
+ struct aesni_xts_ctx *ctx = aes_xts_ctx(tfm);
int tail = req->cryptlen % AES_BLOCK_SIZE;
struct skcipher_request subreq;
struct skcipher_walk walk;
@@ -942,7 +948,7 @@ static int xts_crypt(struct skcipher_request *req, bool encrypt)
kernel_fpu_begin();
/* calculate first value of T */
- aesni_enc(aes_ctx(ctx->raw_tweak_ctx), walk.iv, walk.iv);
+ aesni_enc(&ctx->tweak_ctx, walk.iv, walk.iv);
while (walk.nbytes > 0) {
int nbytes = walk.nbytes;
@@ -951,11 +957,11 @@ static int xts_crypt(struct skcipher_request *req, bool encrypt)
nbytes &= ~(AES_BLOCK_SIZE - 1);
if (encrypt)
- aesni_xts_encrypt(aes_ctx(ctx->raw_crypt_ctx),
+ aesni_xts_encrypt(&ctx->crypt_ctx,
walk.dst.virt.addr, walk.src.virt.addr,
nbytes, walk.iv);
else
- aesni_xts_decrypt(aes_ctx(ctx->raw_crypt_ctx),
+ aesni_xts_decrypt(&ctx->crypt_ctx,
walk.dst.virt.addr, walk.src.virt.addr,
nbytes, walk.iv);
kernel_fpu_end();
@@ -983,11 +989,11 @@ static int xts_crypt(struct skcipher_request *req, bool encrypt)
kernel_fpu_begin();
if (encrypt)
- aesni_xts_encrypt(aes_ctx(ctx->raw_crypt_ctx),
+ aesni_xts_encrypt(&ctx->crypt_ctx,
walk.dst.virt.addr, walk.src.virt.addr,
walk.nbytes, walk.iv);
else
- aesni_xts_decrypt(aes_ctx(ctx->raw_crypt_ctx),
+ aesni_xts_decrypt(&ctx->crypt_ctx,
walk.dst.virt.addr, walk.src.virt.addr,
walk.nbytes, walk.iv);
kernel_fpu_end();
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists