[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0h+frxNpTz4GsjQ=OdbXXnTgLB=ufA5P2pNjbDF_FhNUQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2023 19:47:11 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Wyes Karny <wyes.karny@....com>
Cc: ray.huang@....com, rafael@...nel.org, viresh.kumar@...aro.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
gautham.shenoy@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] amd_pstate: Add ->fast_switch() callback
On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 6:29 PM Wyes Karny <wyes.karny@....com> wrote:
>
> From: "Gautham R. Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@....com>
>
> Schedutil normally calls the adjust_perf callback for drivers with
> adjust_perf callback available and fast_switch_possible flag set.
> However, when frequency invariance is disabled and schedutil tries to
> invoke fast_switch. So, there is a chance of kernel crash if this
> function pointer is not set. To protect against this scenario add
> fast_switch callback to amd_pstate driver.
>
> Fixes: 1d215f0319c2 ("cpufreq: amd-pstate: Add fast switch function for AMD P-State")
>
> Signed-off-by: Wyes Karny <wyes.karny@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <gautham.shenoy@....com>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
> index 5a3d4aa0f45a..45711fc0a856 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
> @@ -444,9 +444,8 @@ static int amd_pstate_verify(struct cpufreq_policy_data *policy)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static int amd_pstate_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> - unsigned int target_freq,
> - unsigned int relation)
> +static int amd_pstate_update_freq(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> + unsigned int target_freq, bool fast_switch)
> {
> struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
> struct amd_cpudata *cpudata = policy->driver_data;
> @@ -465,14 +464,37 @@ static int amd_pstate_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> des_perf = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(target_freq * cap_perf,
> cpudata->max_freq);
>
> - cpufreq_freq_transition_begin(policy, &freqs);
> + WARN_ON(fast_switch && !policy->fast_switch_enabled);
> + /*
> + * If fast_switch is desired, then there aren't any registered
> + * transition notifiers. See comment for
> + * cpufreq_enable_fast_switch().
> + */
> + if (!fast_switch)
> + cpufreq_freq_transition_begin(policy, &freqs);
> +
> amd_pstate_update(cpudata, min_perf, des_perf,
> - max_perf, false, policy->governor->flags);
> - cpufreq_freq_transition_end(policy, &freqs, false);
> + max_perf, fast_switch, policy->governor->flags);
> +
> + if (!fast_switch)
> + cpufreq_freq_transition_end(policy, &freqs, false);
>
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int amd_pstate_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> + unsigned int target_freq,
> + unsigned int relation)
> +{
> + return amd_pstate_update_freq(policy, target_freq, false);
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned int amd_pstate_fast_switch(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> + unsigned int target_freq)
> +{
> + return amd_pstate_update_freq(policy, target_freq, true);
> +}
> +
> static void amd_pstate_adjust_perf(unsigned int cpu,
> unsigned long _min_perf,
> unsigned long target_perf,
> @@ -715,6 +737,7 @@ static int amd_pstate_cpu_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>
> freq_qos_remove_request(&cpudata->req[1]);
> freq_qos_remove_request(&cpudata->req[0]);
> + policy->fast_switch_possible = false;
> kfree(cpudata);
>
> return 0;
> @@ -1309,6 +1332,7 @@ static struct cpufreq_driver amd_pstate_driver = {
> .flags = CPUFREQ_CONST_LOOPS | CPUFREQ_NEED_UPDATE_LIMITS,
> .verify = amd_pstate_verify,
> .target = amd_pstate_target,
> + .fast_switch = amd_pstate_fast_switch,
> .init = amd_pstate_cpu_init,
> .exit = amd_pstate_cpu_exit,
> .suspend = amd_pstate_cpu_suspend,
> --
Applied along with the [2/3], thanks!
Do you need them in 6.4 or would 6.5 be sufficient? Also do you need
them to go into "stable"?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists