[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <CSU6HS37JN7M.11R5RM34EADW@suppilovahvero>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2023 06:13:21 +0300
From: "Jarkko Sakkinen" <jarkko@...nel.org>
To: "Niklas Schnelle" <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>, "Peter Huewe" <peterhuewe@....de>,
"Jason Gunthorpe" <jgg@...pe.ca>
Cc: "Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
"Mauro Carvalho Chehab" <mchehab@...nel.org>,
"Alan Stern" <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
"Geert Uytterhoeven" <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
"Paul Walmsley" <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
"Palmer Dabbelt" <palmer@...belt.com>,
"Albert Ou" <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...nel.org>,
<linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 05/44] char: tpm: handle HAS_IOPORT dependencies
On Mon May 22, 2023 at 1:50 PM EEST, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
> In a future patch HAS_IOPORT=n will result in inb()/outb() and friends
> not being declared. We thus need to add this dependency and ifdef
> sections of code using inb()/outb() as alternative access methods.
>
> Co-developed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>
> ---
> drivers/char/tpm/Kconfig | 1 +
> drivers/char/tpm/tpm_infineon.c | 16 ++++++++++++----
> drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c | 19 ++++++++-----------
> 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/Kconfig b/drivers/char/tpm/Kconfig
> index 927088b2c3d3..418c9ed59ffd 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/Kconfig
> @@ -149,6 +149,7 @@ config TCG_NSC
> config TCG_ATMEL
> tristate "Atmel TPM Interface"
> depends on PPC64 || HAS_IOPORT_MAP
> + depends on HAS_IOPORT
> help
> If you have a TPM security chip from Atmel say Yes and it
> will be accessible from within Linux. To compile this driver
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_infineon.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_infineon.c
> index 9c924a1440a9..99c6e565ec8d 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_infineon.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_infineon.c
> @@ -26,7 +26,9 @@
> #define TPM_MAX_TRIES 5000
> #define TPM_INFINEON_DEV_VEN_VALUE 0x15D1
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT
> #define TPM_INF_IO_PORT 0x0
> +#endif
> #define TPM_INF_IO_MEM 0x1
>
> #define TPM_INF_ADDR 0x0
> @@ -51,34 +53,40 @@ static struct tpm_inf_dev tpm_dev;
>
> static inline void tpm_data_out(unsigned char data, unsigned char offset)
> {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT
> if (tpm_dev.iotype == TPM_INF_IO_PORT)
> outb(data, tpm_dev.data_regs + offset);
> else
> +#endif
> writeb(data, tpm_dev.mem_base + tpm_dev.data_regs + offset);
> }
>
> static inline unsigned char tpm_data_in(unsigned char offset)
> {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT
> if (tpm_dev.iotype == TPM_INF_IO_PORT)
> return inb(tpm_dev.data_regs + offset);
> - else
> - return readb(tpm_dev.mem_base + tpm_dev.data_regs + offset);
> +#endif
> + return readb(tpm_dev.mem_base + tpm_dev.data_regs + offset);
> }
>
> static inline void tpm_config_out(unsigned char data, unsigned char offset)
> {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT
> if (tpm_dev.iotype == TPM_INF_IO_PORT)
> outb(data, tpm_dev.config_port + offset);
> else
> +#endif
> writeb(data, tpm_dev.mem_base + tpm_dev.index_off + offset);
> }
>
> static inline unsigned char tpm_config_in(unsigned char offset)
> {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT
> if (tpm_dev.iotype == TPM_INF_IO_PORT)
> return inb(tpm_dev.config_port + offset);
> - else
> - return readb(tpm_dev.mem_base + tpm_dev.index_off + offset);
> +#endif
> + return readb(tpm_dev.mem_base + tpm_dev.index_off + offset);
> }
>
> /* TPM header definitions */
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
> index 558144fa707a..0ee5a83e35a8 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
> @@ -954,11 +954,6 @@ static void tpm_tis_clkrun_enable(struct tpm_chip *chip, bool value)
> clkrun_val &= ~LPC_CLKRUN_EN;
> iowrite32(clkrun_val, data->ilb_base_addr + LPC_CNTRL_OFFSET);
>
> - /*
> - * Write any random value on port 0x80 which is on LPC, to make
> - * sure LPC clock is running before sending any TPM command.
> - */
> - outb(0xCC, 0x80);
> } else {
> data->clkrun_enabled--;
> if (data->clkrun_enabled)
> @@ -969,13 +964,15 @@ static void tpm_tis_clkrun_enable(struct tpm_chip *chip, bool value)
> /* Enable LPC CLKRUN# */
> clkrun_val |= LPC_CLKRUN_EN;
> iowrite32(clkrun_val, data->ilb_base_addr + LPC_CNTRL_OFFSET);
> -
> - /*
> - * Write any random value on port 0x80 which is on LPC, to make
> - * sure LPC clock is running before sending any TPM command.
> - */
> - outb(0xCC, 0x80);
> }
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT
> + /*
> + * Write any random value on port 0x80 which is on LPC, to make
> + * sure LPC clock is running before sending any TPM command.
> + */
> + outb(0xCC, 0x80);
> +#endif
> }
>
> static const struct tpm_class_ops tpm_tis = {
> --
> 2.39.2
Acked-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
BR, Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists