[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230524191058.fkvl255j6fjcm4m5@unabashed>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2023 14:10:58 -0500
From: Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
To: Andrew Davis <afd@...com>
CC: Francesco Dolcini <francesco@...cini.it>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
Francesco Dolcini <francesco.dolcini@...adex.com>,
Tero Kristo <kristo@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/5] dt-bindings: arm: ti: add toradex,verdin-am62 et
al.
On 12:48-20230524, Andrew Davis wrote:
[..]
> In fact I'm not sure we get much value at all out of top level whole-SoC compatible
> strings. Maybe we did when there was matching in kernel to do device specific fixups,
> but that isn't really used much in ARM64.
If you are arguing about const: ti,am625 - there is a bunch more other
S/w systems that use compatibles for various purposes in addition to
usage in userspace (test systems etc) that benefit. Unless there is a
ARM64 wide trend to drop it, I don't see a reason to have a discussion
on that.
--
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3 1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D
Powered by blists - more mailing lists