linux-kernel - Re: CSC3551 and devices missing related

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <19d69a5da8f1d4017ac14ed87f927ab82278073d.camel@ljones.dev>
Date:   Thu, 25 May 2023 09:30:24 +1200
From:   Luke Jones <luke@...nes.dev>
To:     Stuart Henderson <stuarth@...nsource.cirrus.com>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tiwai@...e.com,
        sbinding@...nsource.cirrus.com, perex@...ex.cz,
        tangmeng@...ontech.com, andy.chi@...onical.com, p.jungkamp@....net,
        kasper93@...il.com, yangyuchi66@...il.com, armas@...ux.tech,
        ealex95@...il.com, james.schulman@...rus.com,
        david.rhodes@...rus.com, tanureal@...nsource.cirrus.com,
        rf@...nsource.cirrus.com, patches@...nsource.cirrus.com,
        alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Subject: Re: CSC3551 and devices missing related _DSD bits

On Wed, 2023-05-24 at 17:36 +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> 
> > The problem is that this can really easily blow up your machine if
> > some incorrect bit is applied.  And more easily applicable, more
> > chance to break by novice users, simply by believing what a chat
> > bot
> > speaks :)
> > That's the very reason why this kind of change should be via ACPI
> > table officially set up by the vendor.  That said, the question is
> > only who and how can be responsible for this kind of change.  It's
> > no technical issue, per se.
> > 
> > If BIOS can't be updated, at least, the configuration change has to
> > be
> > confirmed by ASUS people.  If ASUS still ignores the inquires and
> > requests, we may put the quirk but with a bit fat warning (and
> > maybe
> > complaints to ASUS) to be shown in the log as a very last resort.
> > 
> > Let's see what happens.
> 
> Thanks Takashi.
> 
> Just a note to say we're not ignoring this and are investigating the 
> best way to support released laptops with ACPI incompatible with
> Linux.  
> We're hoping this is going to be less of an issue going forward. 
> Please 
> bear with us while we look into this.
> 

This is great news, thank you Stuart. If you need testing done at all
on a wide range please reach out to me and I will enlist the help of
those with the affected laptops I mentioned.