[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49e98308-ab8d-5811-66a8-9e17f22bb8c4@loongson.cn>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2023 11:19:04 +0800
From: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>
To: Alexander Kapshuk <alexander.kapshuk@...il.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp@...s.com>, Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
loongarch@...ts.linux.dev, loongson-kernel@...ts.loongnix.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf arm64: Handle __NR3264_ prefixed syscall number
On 05/23/2023 08:31 PM, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
> On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 1:22 PM Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn> wrote:
>>
>> After commit 9854e7ad35fe ("perf arm64: Simplify mksyscalltbl"),
>> in the generated syscall table file syscalls.c, there exist some
>> __NR3264_ prefixed syscall numbers such as [__NR3264_ftruncate],
>> it looks like not so good, just do some small filter operations
>> to handle __NR3264_ prefixed syscall number as a digital number.
>>
>> Without this patch:
>>
>> [__NR3264_ftruncate] = "ftruncate",
>>
>> With this patch:
>>
>> [46] = "ftruncate",
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>
>> ---
>> tools/perf/arch/arm64/entry/syscalls/mksyscalltbl | 7 ++++---
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/arm64/entry/syscalls/mksyscalltbl b/tools/perf/arch/arm64/entry/syscalls/mksyscalltbl
>> index 22cdf91..59ab7939 100755
>> --- a/tools/perf/arch/arm64/entry/syscalls/mksyscalltbl
>> +++ b/tools/perf/arch/arm64/entry/syscalls/mksyscalltbl
>> @@ -39,7 +39,8 @@ create_table()
>> echo "};"
>> }
>>
>> -$gcc -E -dM -x c -I $incpath/include/uapi $input \
>> - |sed -ne 's/^#define __NR_//p' \
>> - |sort -t' ' -k2 -n \
>> +$gcc -E -dM -x c -I $incpath/include/uapi $input \
>> + |awk '{if ($2~"__NR" && $3 !~"__NR3264_") {print}}' \
>> + |sed -ne 's/^#define __NR_//p;s/^#define __NR3264_//p' \
>> + |sort -t' ' -k2 -n \
>> |create_table
>> --
>> 2.1.0
>>
>
> As an aside, the awk + sed + sort parts of the command line may be
> reduced to the following awk script, if desired:
> awk '$2 ~ "__NR" && $3 !~ "__NR3264_" {
> sub("^#define __NR_", "")
> sub("^#define __NR3264_", "")
> print | "sort -k2 -n"
> }'
>
Hi Alexander,
Thanks, it seems more simple and works well as expected.
Let us wait for more review comments before respin.
If no any objections, I will send v2 with the following
changes based on the current patch in the next week.
-$gcc -E -dM -x c -I $incpath/include/uapi $input \
- |awk '{if ($2~"__NR" && $3 !~"__NR3264_") {print}}' \
- |sed -ne 's/^#define __NR_//p;s/^#define __NR3264_//p' \
- |sort -t' ' -k2 -n \
+$gcc -E -dM -x c -I $incpath/include/uapi $input \
+ |awk '$2 ~ "__NR" && $3 !~ "__NR3264_" {
+ sub("^#define __NR_", "")
+ sub("^#define __NR3264_", "")
+ print | "sort -k2 -n"}' \
|create_table
Thanks,
Tiezhu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists