[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8f73b826-5a1e-462d-91e4-5c518751c1ee@lunn.ch>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2023 01:31:16 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: arinc9.unal@...il.com
Cc: Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
Landen Chao <Landen.Chao@...iatek.com>,
DENG Qingfang <dqfext@...il.com>,
Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@...nc9.com>,
Richard van Schagen <richard@...terhints.com>,
Richard van Schagen <vschagen@...com>,
Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@...lic-files.de>,
Bartel Eerdekens <bartel.eerdekens@...stell8.be>,
erkin.bozoglu@...ont.com, mithat.guner@...ont.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 02/30] net: dsa: mt7530: use p5_interface_select
as data type for p5_intf_sel
On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 03:15:04PM +0300, arinc9.unal@...il.com wrote:
> From: Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@...nc9.com>
>
> Use the p5_interface_select enumeration as the data type for the
> p5_intf_sel field. This ensures p5_intf_sel can only take the values
> defined in the p5_interface_select enumeration.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@...nc9.com>
> Acked-by: Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>
> ---
> drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.h | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.h b/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.h
> index 845f5dd16d83..415d8ea07472 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.h
> @@ -675,7 +675,7 @@ struct mt7530_port {
>
> /* Port 5 interface select definitions */
> enum p5_interface_select {
> - P5_DISABLED = 0,
> + P5_DISABLED,
Is this change important in this context? Maybe add something to the
commit message about it?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists