[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9372c8df-5604-0284-ba3a-74af4ca435e3@alliedtelesis.co.nz>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2023 23:49:46 +0000
From: Chris Packham <Chris.Packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>
To: "miquel.raynal@...tlin.com" <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
"richard@....at" <richard@....at>,
"vigneshr@...com" <vigneshr@...com>,
"bbrezillon@...nel.org" <bbrezillon@...nel.org>
CC: "linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mtd: rawnand: marvell: ensure timing values are
written
On 24/05/23 12:05, Chris Packham wrote:
> When new timing values are calculated in marvell_nfc_setup_interface()
> ensure that they will be applied in marvell_nfc_select_target() by
> clearing the selected_chip pointer.
>
> Fixes: b25251414f6e ("mtd: rawnand: marvell: Stop implementing ->select_chip()")
> Suggested-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Packham <chris.packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>
> ---
>
> Notes:
> This at least gets me to a point where I can illustrated the problem
> reported to me. It appears that despite the chip correctly reporting
> support for SDR timing modes up to 4 the observed tWC is 20ns. I've not
> seen any actual problem running in this state the only complaint is that
> the datasheet says the minimum tWC is 25ns.
>
> If I make a change to my bootloader such that the NAND Clock Frequency
> Select bit (0xF2440700:0) to 1 before booting the kernel _and_ I remove
> the extra factor of 2 from the period_ns calculation I observe tWC of
> about 60ns. If I don't remove the factor of 2 the NAND interface doesn't
> work (can't write BBT).
>
> Changes in v2:
> - reword comment per suggestion from Miquel, add fixes tag
Actually thinking about this I should probably also include a change to
drop the unconditional NAND Clock Frequency select. Some marvell_nand
users probably aren't getting the best timings without this change but
those with a system controller will probably end up with timings faster
than intended (which may work depending on design tolerances).
>
> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/marvell_nand.c | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/marvell_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/marvell_nand.c
> index afb424579f0b..f1fcf136ad03 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/marvell_nand.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/marvell_nand.c
> @@ -2457,6 +2457,12 @@ static int marvell_nfc_setup_interface(struct nand_chip *chip, int chipnr,
> NDTR1_WAIT_MODE;
> }
>
> + /*
> + * Reset nfc->selected_chip so the next command will cause the timing
> + * registers to be updated in marvell_nfc_select_target().
> + */
> + nfc->selected_chip = NULL;
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists