[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZG2edCPs7qPgABby@Asurada-Nvidia>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2023 22:19:48 -0700
From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>
To: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>
CC: "Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@...el.com>,
"joro@...tes.org" <joro@...tes.org>,
"alex.williamson@...hat.com" <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
"jgg@...dia.com" <jgg@...dia.com>,
"robin.murphy@....com" <robin.murphy@....com>,
"baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com" <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
"cohuck@...hat.com" <cohuck@...hat.com>,
"eric.auger@...hat.com" <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com" <mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com>,
"chao.p.peng@...ux.intel.com" <chao.p.peng@...ux.intel.com>,
"yi.y.sun@...ux.intel.com" <yi.y.sun@...ux.intel.com>,
"peterx@...hat.com" <peterx@...hat.com>,
"jasowang@...hat.com" <jasowang@...hat.com>,
"shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com"
<shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>,
"lulu@...hat.com" <lulu@...hat.com>,
"suravee.suthikulpanit@....com" <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>,
"iommu@...ts.linux.dev" <iommu@...ts.linux.dev>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
"Duan, Zhenzhong" <zhenzhong.duan@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] iommufd: Add IOMMU_DEVICE_GET_HW_INFO
On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 05:00:40AM +0000, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> > > > +};
> > > > +#define IOMMU_DEVICE_GET_HW_INFO _IO(IOMMUFD_TYPE,
> > > > IOMMUFD_CMD_DEVICE_GET_HW_INFO)
> > > > #endif
> > >
> > > Here we have a naming confusion.
> > >
> > > 'IOMMU' is the prefix of iommufd ioctls.
> > >
> > > 'DEVICE' is the subjective.
> > >
> > > Then "GET_HW_INFO" implies getting hardware info related to
> > > this device. then it should not be restricted to the iommu info.
> > >
> > > with that it's clearer to call it IOMMU_DEVICE_GET_IOMMU_INFO.
> >
> > Though the entire ioctl is tied to the input "dev_id", I think
> > it isn't really about the device corresponding to the dev_id,
> > similar to the IOMMU_HWPT_ALLOC having a dev_id input too. So,
> > I think the "IOMMU_DEVICE" here should be interpreted simply
> > as "an iommu device". We could also highlight this somewhere
> > in the header.
>
> yes this is a good view of it. with that it's not necessary to have
> a 'DEVICE' notation in the name which looks confusing with dev_id.
>
> Just IOMMU_GET_HW_INFO for the iommu behind the specified dev_id.
>
> then keep the structure name as iommu_hw_info.
That'd be neat.
> > With that being said, IOMMU_DEVICE_SET/UNSET_DATA should be
> > renamed to IOMMU_DEVICE_SET/UNSET_DEV_DATA -- "DEVICE" is the
> > iommu device while the "DEV_DATA" is a given device that's
> > behind the iommu.
>
> this then becomes IOMMU_SET/UNSET_DEV_DATA.
Ack.
Thanks
Nic
Powered by blists - more mailing lists