[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dbcd41cb-3355-d052-07a0-093638e36a2b@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2023 08:03:43 +0700
From: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
To: J Lovejoy <opensource@...ayne.com>,
Linux SPDX Licenses <linux-spdx@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Actions <linux-actions@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>,
Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@...ow.org>,
Kate Stewart <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>,
Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@...b.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Pali Rohár <pali@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] fs: udf: Replace GPL 2.0 boilerplate license
notice with SPDX identifier
On 5/24/23 00:58, J Lovejoy wrote:
> it looks like in a couple cases you have removed the word, "COPYRIGHT" and in the other cases you have not. I could be consistent one way or another and lean towards removing it, as I see it as a heading for the old license notice, but Richard may have a different view :)
>
I don't have the context that you mean (I have no idea what
code you're referring to). Please reply inline with appropriate
context in the future.
--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
Powered by blists - more mailing lists