[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZG2+Jl8X1i5zGdMK@dread.disaster.area>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2023 17:35:02 +1000
From: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-bcachefs@...r.kernel.org,
Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCH 20/32] vfs: factor out inode hash head
calculation
On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 11:44:03PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 08:53:22AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > Hi Christian - I suspect you should pull the latest version of these
> > patches from:
> >
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dgc/linux-xfs.git vfs-scale
> >
> > The commit messages are more recent and complete, and I've been
> > testing the branch in all my test kernels since 6.4-rc1 without
> > issues.
>
> Can you please send the series to linux-fsdevel for review?
When it gets back to the top of my priority pile. Last time I sent
it there was zero interest in reviewing it from fs/vfs developers
but it attracted lots of obnoxious shouting from some RTPREEMPT
people about using bit locks. If there's interest in getting it
merged, then I can add it to my backlog of stuff to do...
As it is, I'm buried layers deep right now, so I really have no
bandwidth to deal with this in the foreseeable future. The code is
there, it works just fine, if you want to push it through the
process of getting it merged, you're more than welcome to do so.
-Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@...morbit.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists