linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] tools/nolibc: stack protector compatibility fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <cb3f0f8f-f067-450f-8d5b-9a1ad2a2cd7f@t-8ch.de>
Date:   Wed, 24 May 2023 09:38:44 +0200
From:   Thomas Weißschuh <thomas@...ch.de>
To:     Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
Cc:     Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Zhangjin Wu <falcon@...ylab.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] tools/nolibc: stack protector compatibility fixes

On 2023-05-24 09:35:30+0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
> 
> On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 08:44:41AM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> > Two fixes for nolibc to
> > * allow users to explicitly disable (or theoretically enable) when
> >   building the tests
> > * fix stackprotectors on GCC < 10.
> 
> Nice, thank you. Just tested with gcc 9.5, works both with and without
> stkp. Now pushed to branch 20230524-nolibc-rv32+stkp4. I've dropped my
> exp patch and the associated revert. I think your two patches that clean
> up the makefile options and the new one here that restores the cflags
> should be squashed since the latter just partially reverts the former,
> and that way the series remains bisectable. Just let me know if you're
> OK, I can just to that and re-push.

Sounds good to me!

Thomas