[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAC_iWjKxXrEgpqgnpt8g0ummdb1mFbwgMVTSVqfRTNbXOwhz2w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2023 11:00:21 +0300
From: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>
To: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>
Cc: Masahisa Kojima <masahisa.kojima@...aro.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, op-tee@...ts.trustedfirmware.org,
Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] introduce tee-based EFI Runtime Variable Service
Hi Sumit,
On Wed, 24 May 2023 at 10:56, Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 23 May 2023 at 14:36, Masahisa Kojima
> <masahisa.kojima@...aro.org> wrote:
> >
> > This series introduces the tee based EFI Runtime Variable Service.
> >
> > The eMMC device is typically owned by the non-secure world(linux in
> > this case). There is an existing solution utilizing eMMC RPMB partition
> > for EFI Variables, it is implemented by interacting with
> > OP-TEE, StandaloneMM(as EFI Variable Service Pseudo TA), eMMC driver
> > and tee-supplicant. The last piece is the tee-based variable access
> > driver to interact with OP-TEE and StandaloneMM.
> >
> > Changelog:
> > v3 -> v4:
> > - replace the reference from EDK2 to PI Specification
> > - remove EDK2 source code reference comments
> > - prepare nonblocking variant of set_variable, it just returns
> > EFI_UNSUPPORTED
> > - remove redundant buffer size check
> > - argument name change in mm_communicate
> > - function interface changes in setup_mm_hdr to remove (void **) cast
>
> I don't have detailed insights into how EFI spec mandates StandaloneMM
> should be implemented. But utilizing OP-TEE as the underlying
> transport here looks fine to me. FWIW,
>
> For the series:
> Acked-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>
Thanks!
FWIW the PI spec describes some of the functionality and how that
should be accessed.
There's a EFI_MM_COMMUNICATION_PROTOCOL which is not used here.
Instead the entry point is via an SMC to op-tee and the payload
adheres to what the PI spec describes in its EFI_MM_COMMUNICATE_HEADER
Regards
/Ilias
>
> -Sumit
>
> >
> > v2 -> v3:
> > - add CONFIG_EFI dependency to TEE_STMM_EFI
> > - add missing return code check for tee_client_invoke_func()
> > - directly call efivars_register/unregister from tee_stmm_efi.c
> >
> > rfc v1 -> v2:
> > - split patch into three patches, one for drivers/tee,
> > one for include/linux/efi.h, and one for the driver/firmware/efi/stmm
> > - context/session management into probe() and remove() same as other tee
> > client driver
> > - StMM variable driver is moved from driver/tee/optee to driver/firmware/efi
> > - use "tee" prefix instead of "optee" in driver/firmware/efi/stmm/tee_stmm_efi.c,
> > this file does not contain op-tee specific code, abstracted by tee layer and
> > StMM variable driver will work on other tee implementation.
> > - PTA_STMM_CMD_COMMUNICATE -> PTA_STMM_CMD_COMMUNICATE
> > - implement query_variable_store() but currently not used
> > - no use of TEEC_SUCCESS, it is defined in driver/tee/optee/optee_private.h.
> > Other tee client drivers use 0 instead of using TEEC_SUCCESS
> > - remove TEEC_ERROR_EXCESS_DATA status, it is referred just to output
> > error message
> >
> > Masahisa Kojima (3):
> > efi: expose efivar generic ops register function
> > efi: Add EFI_ACCESS_DENIED status code
> > efi: Add tee-based EFI variable driver
> >
> > drivers/firmware/efi/Kconfig | 15 +
> > drivers/firmware/efi/Makefile | 1 +
> > drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c | 12 +
> > drivers/firmware/efi/stmm/mm_communication.h | 236 +++++++
> > drivers/firmware/efi/stmm/tee_stmm_efi.c | 637 +++++++++++++++++++
> > include/linux/efi.h | 4 +
> > 6 files changed, 905 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 drivers/firmware/efi/stmm/mm_communication.h
> > create mode 100644 drivers/firmware/efi/stmm/tee_stmm_efi.c
> >
> > --
> > 2.30.2
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists