lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dbc686ac-2d28-8cd8-417b-4d10477d0f79@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed, 24 May 2023 11:12:28 +0200
From:   David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To:     yang.yang29@....com.cn, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc:     imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, ran.xiaokai@....com.cn, xu.xin.sc@...il.com,
        xu.xin16@....com.cn, jiang.xuexin@....com.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/5] ksm: support tracking KSM-placed zero-pages

On 24.05.23 07:51, yang.yang29@....com.cn wrote:
> From: xu xin <xu.xin16@....com.cn>
> 
> The core idea of this patch set is to enable users to perceive the number
> of any pages merged by KSM, regardless of whether use_zero_page switch has
> been turned on, so that users can know how much free memory increase is
> really due to their madvise(MERGEABLE) actions. But the problem is, when
> enabling use_zero_pages, all empty pages will be merged with kernel zero
> pages instead of with each other as use_zero_pages is disabled, and then
> these zero-pages are no longer monitored by KSM.
> 
> The motivations to do this is seen at:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/202302100915227721315@zte.com.cn/
> 
> In one word, we hope to implement the support for KSM-placed zero pages
> tracking without affecting the feature of use_zero_pages, so that app
> developer can also benefit from knowing the actual KSM profit by getting
> KSM-placed zero pages to optimize applications eventually when
> /sys/kernel/mm/ksm/use_zero_pages is enabled.
> 


Ran the tests and they worked as expected. I only had some remaining 
feedback for the last patch, otherwise LGTM.

-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ