[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <CSU49W63M584.3VBYBMYWJZ3H5@suppilovahvero>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2023 04:29:00 +0300
From: "Jarkko Sakkinen" <jarkko@...nel.org>
To: "Lino Sanfilippo" <l.sanfilippo@...bus.com>,
"Lino Sanfilippo" <LinoSanfilippo@....de>, <peterhuewe@....de>,
<jgg@...pe.ca>
Cc: <jsnitsel@...hat.com>, <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
<oe-lkp@...ts.linux.dev>, <lkp@...el.com>,
<peter.ujfalusi@...ux.intel.com>, <peterz@...radead.org>,
<linux@...ewoehner.de>, <linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <lukas@...ner.de>,
<p.rosenberger@...bus.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] tpm, tpm_tis: reuse code in disable_interrupts()
On Tue May 23, 2023 at 11:52 PM EEST, Lino Sanfilippo wrote:
>
>
> On 23.05.23 21:07, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
>
> >
> > NAK as invidual change w/o further discussion.
> >
> > Would need to be seen in context. This does not change kernel for
> > better.
> >
> > If you want to wrap, please do it in 1/2 and then we can evaluate
> > whether it makes sense or not.
> >
>
> Ok, will do so.
And generally: keep it *minimal* :-) We want to exactly fix the bug,
and take absolutely no other action.
BR, Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists