[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8bc94098-8a57-b62f-a26c-7c73bf945b41@google.com>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2023 18:57:17 -0700 (PDT)
From: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
To: Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com>
cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com>,
Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Yu Zhao <yuzhao@...gle.com>,
Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@...dia.com>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
Steven Price <steven.price@....com>,
SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>,
Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@....com>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
Zack Rusin <zackr@...are.com>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@...gle.com>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>,
Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
Thomas Hellstrom <thomas.hellstrom@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/31] mm/migrate: remove cruft from
migration_entry_wait()s
On Tue, 23 May 2023, Alistair Popple wrote:
>
> Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com> writes:
>
> > migration_entry_wait_on_locked() does not need to take a mapped pte
> > pointer, its callers can do the unmap first. Annotate it with
> > __releases(ptl) to reduce sparse warnings.
>
> Thanks Hugh, I debated doing something similar when I reworked this to
> not take a pageref. However I was unsure if the pte unmap/unlock
> ordering mattered as this reverses the order of operations (from unlock
> then unmap to unmap then unlock).
>
> I never found any reason why that would be a problem though so please
> add:
>
> Reviewed-by: Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com>
Thanks Alistair. Right, the ordering doesn't matter: you might briefly
think that because I'm going to put the rcu_read_unlock() into the
pte_unmap(), that there's something wrong with doing that early; but
you'd quickly realize that holding on to the spinlock is good enough.
Hugh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists