[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALHCpMh2sZSCrFMMT13kYbsu+C2bC2xY3coB_fv0mZom_g=oPQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2023 14:36:28 +0300
From: Maxim Kiselev <bigunclemax@...il.com>
To: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>
Cc: linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@...ll.eu>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Cosmin Tanislav <demonsingur@...il.com>,
Mike Looijmans <mike.looijmans@...ic.nl>,
Haibo Chen <haibo.chen@....com>,
ChiYuan Huang <cy_huang@...htek.com>,
Ramona Bolboaca <ramona.bolboaca@...log.com>,
Ibrahim Tilki <Ibrahim.Tilki@...log.com>,
Caleb Connolly <caleb.connolly@...aro.org>,
William Breathitt Gray <william.gray@...aro.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Leonard Göhrs <l.goehrs@...gutronix.de>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@...onoff.com>,
ChiaEn Wu <chiaen_wu@...htek.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/4] Add support for Allwinner GPADC on
D1/T113s/R329 SoCs
Hi Andre,
thanks for you comments
> This may sound kind of obvious, but wouldn't it be easier to model this
> with one compatible string, and have the number of channels as a DT
> property?
Yes, I completely agree that using separate config for each SoCs is looks
overcomplicated because the only difference is the number of channels.
I thought about a DT property with channels number but I didn't find
another ADC driver with the same approach (except i2c ADC's with child nodes).
> Or, alternatively, using iio/multiplexer/io-channel-mux.yaml, since it's
> only one ADC anyway?
I'm sorry, I didn't quite understand what you're suggesting.
> And btw: it seems that the T507 (the H616 die with a different pinout) has
> the same IP, with four channels:
> http://dl.linux-sunxi.org/T507/
Oh, thanks for pointing that. I'll add it to the list in the next version.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists