[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3170440.5fSG56mABF@kreacher>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2023 13:45:38 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1 4/6] device property: Add SOFTWARE_NODE() macro for defining software nodes
From: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
Add SOFTWARE_NODE() macro in order to make defining software nodes look
nicer. This is analogous to different PROPERTY_ENTRY_*() macros for
defining properties.
Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
---
Same as https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-acpi/patch/20230329100951.1522322-5-sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com/
---
include/linux/property.h | 7 +++++++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
Index: linux-pm/include/linux/property.h
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/include/linux/property.h
+++ linux-pm/include/linux/property.h
@@ -476,6 +476,13 @@ struct software_node {
const struct property_entry *properties;
};
+#define SOFTWARE_NODE(_name_, _properties_, _parent_) \
+ (struct software_node) { \
+ .name = _name_, \
+ .properties = _properties_, \
+ .parent = _parent_, \
+ }
+
bool is_software_node(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode);
const struct software_node *
to_software_node(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists