[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <18c33bf0-0c7e-7584-5149-33cf77b50b8a@suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2023 13:58:24 +0200
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: corbet@....net, will@...nel.org, boqun.feng@...il.com,
mark.rutland@....com, catalin.marinas@....com, dennis@...nel.org,
tj@...nel.org, cl@...ux.com, hca@...ux.ibm.com, gor@...ux.ibm.com,
agordeev@...ux.ibm.com, borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com,
svens@...ux.ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org,
hpa@...or.com, joro@...tes.org, suravee.suthikulpanit@....com,
robin.murphy@....com, dwmw2@...radead.org,
baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, davem@...emloft.net,
penberg@...nel.org, rientjes@...gle.com, iamjoonsoo.kim@....com,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
roman.gushchin@...ux.dev, 42.hyeyoo@...il.com,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
iommu@...ts.linux.dev, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/11] mm/slub: Fold slab_update_freelist()
On 5/15/23 09:57, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> The two functions slab_update_freelist() and __slab_update_freelist()
> are nearly identical, fold and add a boolean argument and rely on
> constant propagation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Something like that has been tried before and the result:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAHk-=wiJLqL2cUhJbvpyPQpkbVOu1rVSzgO2=S2jC55hneLtfQ@mail.gmail.com/
Your parameter is not called 'locked' but 'irq_save' which is better, but
that's just one detail.
After your refactoring in 08/11 which puts most of the code into
__update_freelist_fast() and _slow() I'd say the result is not so bad already.
BTW I have some suspicion that some SLUB code is based on assumptions that
are no longer true these days. IIRC I've seen some microbenchmark results a
while ago that showed that disabling/enabling irqs is surprisingly (to me)
very cheap today, so maybe it's not so useful to keep doing the
this_cpu_cmpxchg128 for the struct kmem_cache_cpu operations (less so for
struct slab cmpxchg128 where actually different cpus may be involved). But
it needs a closer look.
> ---
> mm/slub.c | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/mm/slub.c
> +++ b/mm/slub.c
> @@ -559,53 +559,29 @@ __update_freelist_slow(struct slab *slab
> * allocation/ free operation in hardirq context. Therefore nothing can
> * interrupt the operation.
> */
> -static inline bool __slab_update_freelist(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slab *slab,
> - void *freelist_old, unsigned long counters_old,
> - void *freelist_new, unsigned long counters_new,
> - const char *n)
> +static __always_inline
> +bool slab_update_freelist(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slab *slab,
> + void *freelist_old, unsigned long counters_old,
> + void *freelist_new, unsigned long counters_new,
> + bool irq_save, const char *n)
> {
> bool ret;
>
> - if (USE_LOCKLESS_FAST_PATH())
> + if (!irq_save && USE_LOCKLESS_FAST_PATH())
> lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled();
>
> if (s->flags & __CMPXCHG_DOUBLE) {
> ret = __update_freelist_fast(slab, freelist_old, counters_old,
> freelist_new, counters_new);
> } else {
> - ret = __update_freelist_slow(slab, freelist_old, counters_old,
> - freelist_new, counters_new);
> - }
> - if (likely(ret))
> - return true;
> -
> - cpu_relax();
> - stat(s, CMPXCHG_DOUBLE_FAIL);
> -
> -#ifdef SLUB_DEBUG_CMPXCHG
> - pr_info("%s %s: cmpxchg double redo ", n, s->name);
> -#endif
> -
> - return false;
> -}
> -
> -static inline bool slab_update_freelist(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slab *slab,
> - void *freelist_old, unsigned long counters_old,
> - void *freelist_new, unsigned long counters_new,
> - const char *n)
> -{
> - bool ret;
> -
> - if (s->flags & __CMPXCHG_DOUBLE) {
> - ret = __update_freelist_fast(slab, freelist_old, counters_old,
> - freelist_new, counters_new);
> - } else {
> unsigned long flags;
>
> - local_irq_save(flags);
> + if (irq_save)
> + local_irq_save(flags);
> ret = __update_freelist_slow(slab, freelist_old, counters_old,
> freelist_new, counters_new);
> - local_irq_restore(flags);
> + if (irq_save)
> + local_irq_restore(flags);
> }
> if (likely(ret))
> return true;
> @@ -2250,10 +2226,10 @@ static inline void *acquire_slab(struct
> VM_BUG_ON(new.frozen);
> new.frozen = 1;
>
> - if (!__slab_update_freelist(s, slab,
> - freelist, counters,
> - new.freelist, new.counters,
> - "acquire_slab"))
> + if (!slab_update_freelist(s, slab,
> + freelist, counters,
> + new.freelist, new.counters,
> + false, "acquire_slab"))
> return NULL;
>
> remove_partial(n, slab);
> @@ -2577,9 +2553,9 @@ static void deactivate_slab(struct kmem_
>
>
> if (!slab_update_freelist(s, slab,
> - old.freelist, old.counters,
> - new.freelist, new.counters,
> - "unfreezing slab")) {
> + old.freelist, old.counters,
> + new.freelist, new.counters,
> + true, "unfreezing slab")) {
> if (mode == M_PARTIAL)
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&n->list_lock, flags);
> goto redo;
> @@ -2633,10 +2609,10 @@ static void __unfreeze_partials(struct k
>
> new.frozen = 0;
>
> - } while (!__slab_update_freelist(s, slab,
> - old.freelist, old.counters,
> - new.freelist, new.counters,
> - "unfreezing slab"));
> + } while (!slab_update_freelist(s, slab,
> + old.freelist, old.counters,
> + new.freelist, new.counters,
> + false, "unfreezing slab"));
>
> if (unlikely(!new.inuse && n->nr_partial >= s->min_partial)) {
> slab->next = slab_to_discard;
> @@ -3072,10 +3048,10 @@ static inline void *get_freelist(struct
> new.inuse = slab->objects;
> new.frozen = freelist != NULL;
>
> - } while (!__slab_update_freelist(s, slab,
> - freelist, counters,
> - NULL, new.counters,
> - "get_freelist"));
> + } while (!slab_update_freelist(s, slab,
> + freelist, counters,
> + NULL, new.counters,
> + false, "get_freelist"));
>
> return freelist;
> }
> @@ -3666,9 +3642,9 @@ static void __slab_free(struct kmem_cach
> }
>
> } while (!slab_update_freelist(s, slab,
> - prior, counters,
> - head, new.counters,
> - "__slab_free"));
> + prior, counters,
> + head, new.counters,
> + true, "__slab_free"));
>
> if (likely(!n)) {
>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists