[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230524141743.1322c051@wsk>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2023 14:17:43 +0200
From: Lukasz Majewski <lukma@...x.de>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/3] dsa: marvell: Add support for mv88e6071 and 6020
switches
Hi Andrew,
> On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 04:29:09PM +0200, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> > After the commit (SHA1: 7e9517375a14f44ee830ca1c3278076dd65fcc8f);
> > "net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: fix max_mtu of 1492 on 6165, 6191, 6220,
> > 6250, 6290" the error when mv88e6020 or mv88e6071 is used is not
> > present anymore.
>
> > dsa: marvell: Define .set_max_frame_size() function for mv88e6250
> > SoC family
>
> Hi Lukasz
>
> commit 7e9517375a14f44ee830ca1c3278076dd65fcc8f
> Author: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
> Date: Tue Mar 14 20:24:05 2023 +0200
>
> net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: fix max_mtu of 1492 on 6165, 6191, 6220,
> 6250, 6290
> There are 3 classes of switch families that the driver is aware
> of, as far as mv88e6xxx_change_mtu() is concerned:
>
> - MTU configuration is available per port. Here, the
> chip->info->ops->port_set_jumbo_size() method will be present.
>
> - MTU configuration is global to the switch. Here, the
> chip->info->ops->set_max_frame_size() method will be present.
>
> - We don't know how to change the MTU. Here, none of the above
> methods will be present.
>
> Switch families MV88E6165, MV88E6191, MV88E6220, MV88E6250 and
> MV88E6290 fall in category 3.
>
>
> Vladimir indicates here that it is not known how to change the max MTU
> for the MV88E6250. Where did you get the information from to implement
> it?
Please refer to [1].
The mv88e6185_g1_set_max_frame_size() function can be reused (as
registers' offsets and bits are the same for mv88e60{71|20}).
After using Vladimir's patch there is no need to add max_frame size
field and related patches from v6 can be dropped.
>
> Andrew
Links:
[1] - https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg4798861.html
Best regards,
Lukasz Majewski
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Erika Unter
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-59 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: lukma@...x.de
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists