linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next v3 2/7] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: pass directly chip structure to mv88e6xxx_phy_is

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZG4OuWllZp3MZxO8@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date:   Wed, 24 May 2023 14:18:49 +0100
From:   "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To:     Alexis Lothoré <alexis.lothore@...tlin.com>
Cc:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
        paul.arola@...us.com, scott.roberts@...us.com,
        Marek Behún <kabel@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 2/7] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: pass directly chip
 structure to mv88e6xxx_phy_is_internal

On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 03:01:22PM +0200, Alexis Lothoré wrote:
> Since this function is a simple helper, we do not need to pass a full
> dsa_switch structure, we can directly pass the mv88e6xxx_chip structure.
> Doing so will allow to share this function with any other function
> not manipulating dsa_switch structure but needing info about number of
> internal phys
> 
> Reviewed-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
> 
> ---
> Changes since v2:
> - add reviewed-by tags
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexis Lothoré <alexis.lothore@...tlin.com>
> ---

It never ceases to amaze me the way human beings can find creative ways
to mess things up, no matter how well things are documented. The above
commit message (and the others that I've looked at) are all broken
because of this creativity.

In effect, because of the really weird format you've come up with here,
your patches are in effect *not* signed off by you.

The patch format is in Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst
under the section marked "The canonical patch format". Please review.

Please wait a while (a few days) to see if anyone responds to _this_
posting with any other comments. Thanks.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!