[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <01fd1a9f-56c7-4864-bb2b-8b004284c8cc@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2023 14:59:00 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@...labora.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
Zhu Ning <zhuning0077@...il.com>,
Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com>,
Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
David Yang <yangxiaohua@...rest-semi.com>,
Daniel Drake <drake@...lessm.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, kernel@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ASoC: es8316: Increment max value for ALC Capture
Target Volume control
On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 04:49:37PM +0300, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:
> On 5/24/23 13:30, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Presumably you can check the effects of changing the value? It seems
> > plausible that what's written in the code might be accurate and the
> > higher values might actually change the gain but it'd be better to
> > check.
> I haven't noticed a (measurable) change in gain when switching between
> 10 and 11, but my testing equipment is also not that great. Will try to
> improve the tests accuracy.
I'd expect it should be really obvious with a scope if you've got one?
Testing with something consistent like a sine wave (eg, from
speaker-test) should also make a 1.5dB difference noticable enough to
check if there's at least a volume change by ear even if you can't
specifically quantify it.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists