[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230524141717.GM4253@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2023 16:17:17 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akiyks@...il.com,
boqun.feng@...il.com, corbet@....net, keescook@...omium.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux@...linux.org.uk,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, paulmck@...nel.org,
sstabellini@...nel.org, will@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 24/26] locking/atomic: scripts: generate kerneldoc
comments
On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 01:24:27PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> include/linux/atomic/atomic-arch-fallback.h | 1848 +++++++++++-
> include/linux/atomic/atomic-instrumented.h | 2771 +++++++++++++++++-
> include/linux/atomic/atomic-long.h | 925 +++++-
> 29 files changed, 5940 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
So my biggest concern with all this is 5k+ lines of comments that GCC
has to read and discard over and over and over.
I'll see if I can measure a difference in compile time before and after
this here patch.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists