[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8f7e96e6-6b0b-e51f-ba45-b0c827abf59b@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2023 07:38:11 -0700
From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
To: YangHang Liu <yanghliu@...hat.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
CC: <jgg@...dia.com>, <yishaih@...dia.com>,
<shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>, <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
<tglx@...utronix.de>, <darwi@...utronix.de>, <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
<dave.jiang@...el.com>, <jing2.liu@...el.com>,
<ashok.raj@...el.com>, <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
<tom.zanussi@...ux.intel.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 00/11] vfio/pci: Support dynamic allocation of MSI-X
interrupts
Hi YangHang,
On 5/23/2023 7:43 PM, YangHang Liu wrote:
> Running regression tests in the following test matrix:
>
> i40e PF + INTx interrupt + RHEL9 guest -- PASS
> bnx2x PF + MSI-X + RHEL9 guest -- PASS
> iavf VF + MSI-X + Win2019 guest -- PASS
> mlx5_core VF + MSI-X + Win2022 guest -- PASS
> ixgbe PF + INTx + RHEL9 guest -- PASS
> i40e PF + MSIX + Win2019 guest -- PASS
> qede VF + MSIX + RHEL9 guest -- PASS
>
> Tested-by: YangHang Liu <yanghliu@...hat.com>
>
Thank you very much for this thorough testing.
Reinette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists