linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next 03/30] net: dsa: mt7530: properly support MT7531AE and MT7531BE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 24 May 2023 17:48:17 +0300
From:   Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To:     arinc9.unal@...il.com
Cc:     Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
        Landen Chao <Landen.Chao@...iatek.com>,
        DENG Qingfang <dqfext@...il.com>,
        Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@...nc9.com>,
        Richard van Schagen <richard@...terhints.com>,
        Richard van Schagen <vschagen@...com>,
        Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@...lic-files.de>,
        Bartel Eerdekens <bartel.eerdekens@...stell8.be>,
        erkin.bozoglu@...ont.com, mithat.guner@...ont.com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 03/30] net: dsa: mt7530: properly support
 MT7531AE and MT7531BE

On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 03:15:05PM +0300, arinc9.unal@...il.com wrote:
> From: Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@...nc9.com>
> 
> Introduce the p5_sgmii field to store the information for whether port 5
> has got SGMII or not.
> 
> Move the comment about MT7531AE and MT7531BE to mt7531_setup(), where the
> switch is identified.
> 
> Get rid of mt7531_dual_sgmii_supported() now that priv->p5_sgmii stores the
> information. Address the code where mt7531_dual_sgmii_supported() is used.
> 
> Get rid of mt7531_is_rgmii_port() which just prints the opposite of
> priv->p5_sgmii.
> 
> Remove P5_INTF_SEL_GMAC5_SGMII. The p5_interface_select enum is supposed to
> represent the mode that port 5 is being used in, not the hardware
> information of port 5. Set p5_intf_sel to P5_INTF_SEL_GMAC5 instead, if
> port 5 is not dsa_is_unused_port().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@...nc9.com>
> Acked-by: Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>
> ---

Pretty busy patch, and after reading it, I'm not sure:

- why? (this seems to be absent from the commit message)
- how are MT7531AE and MT7531BE supported any more properly after this
  change, as the commit title claims
- what is the overall effect, other than just refactoring. If that's
  all, what's written on the tin needs to be a better representation of
  what's inside.

Pure refactoring is not a bad goal in itself, as long as we're on the
same page that there is a justification which makes the new code better
than the old one.