lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wirrJNoVSOSVK2ae9pa7Q5kJKFYMk2ad-_6YrS1cEScqA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 25 May 2023 10:25:42 -0700
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc:     David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
        Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
        Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>,
        Hillf Danton <hdanton@...a.com>,
        Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: Extending page pinning into fs/direct-io.c

On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 10:15 AM David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> wrote:
>
>  It doesn't seem I can add it to mm.h as an inline function.

What? We already have that pattern inside is_longterm_pinnable_page(),
so that's really strange.

But regardless, please don't duplicate that odd conditional for no
reason, and don't scream.

So regardless of where it is, make that "is_zero_folio()" just do
"is_zero_page(&folio->page)" rather than repeat the question.

I also wonder whether we shouldn't just use the "transparent union"
argument thing more aggressively. Something like

   typedef union {
        struct page *page;
        struct folio *folio;
   } page_or_folio_t __attribute__ ((__transparent_union__));

and then you should be able to do something like this:

    static inline bool is_zero_page(const page_or_folio_t arg)
    {
        return is_zero_pfn(page_to_pfn(arg.page));
    }

and we don't have to keep generating the two versions over and over
and over again.

                Linus

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ